Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2012-04-30
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/826
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/826/799
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/826/799
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2012-10/1/826-educational-innovation-and-teacher-professional-growth
Title: Educational innovation and teacher professional growth
Abstract: The validity of teaching models may firstly depend on learning outcomes achieved by pupils; secondly, it might depend on the understanding developed by teachers—and consequently on the way they judge it. In order to increase the level of validity when teachers are concerned, it is suitable to construct a training structure able to guarantee an adequate level of support and at the same time to promote an autonomous application which is consistent with former professional practice. This article discusses a model of in-service teacher education based on two dimensions: a) "theoretical study versus practical application" b) "support versus autonomy". The employed methodology was designed to handle projects of educational innovation based on integrated teaching models (ITM).
Keywords:
Title: Innovazione educativa e crescita professionale dei docenti
Abstract: La validazione di un modello didattico può dipendere, da un lato, dai risultati di apprendimento ottenuti dagli alunni, e dall'altro, dalla comprensione che gli insegnanti sviluppano dello stesso e conseguentemente dal giudizio che essi esprimono. In riferimento ai docenti, al fine di aumentare il livello di validazione, è opportuno costruire una struttura formativa in grado di garantire un adeguato livello di supporto e al contempo promuovere un'autonomiaapplicativa coerente con la pratica professionale pre-esistente.L'articolo discute un modello di formazione in servizio articolato in due dimensioni: a) "studio teorico versus applicazione pratica" b) "supporto versus autonomia". La metodologia proposta è stata pensata per la gestione di progetti di innovazione educativa basati su modelli didattici integrati (MDI).
Keywords:
Title: Innovation éducative et croissance professionnelle des enseignants
Abstract: La validation d'un modèle éducatif peut dépendre, d'une part, des résultats d'apprentissage obtenus par les élèves, et d'autre part, de comprendre que les enseignants se développent de la même et par conséquent du jugement qu'ils expriment.En ce qui concerne les enseignants, afin d'augmenter le niveau de validation, il est conseillé de construire une structure de formation capable de garantir un niveau de soutien adéquat et en même temps de promouvoir une autonomie approximative cohérente avec une pratique professionnelle préexistante. L'article traite d'un modèle de formation en deux dimensions en deux dimensions: a) "Étude théorique contre application pratique" b) "Support contre autonomie".La méthodologie proposée a été conçue pour la gestion des projets d'innovation éducative basés sur des modèles éducatifs intégrés (MDI). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Innovación educativa y crecimiento profesional de maestros
Abstract: La validación de un modelo educativo puede depender, por un lado, de los resultados de aprendizaje obtenidos por los alumnos, y por otro, de la comprensión que los maestros desarrollan de la misma y, en consecuencia, del juicio que expresan.Con referencia a los maestros, para aumentar el nivel de validación, es aconsejable construir una estructura de capacitación capaz de garantizar un nivel adecuado de apoyo y, al mismo tiempo, promover una autonomía aproximada coherente con una práctica profesional preexistente. El artículo analiza un modelo de capacitación en dos dimensiones en dos dimensiones: a) "Estudio teórico versus aplicación práctica" B) "Soporte versus autonomía".La metodología propuesta fue diseñada para la gestión de proyectos de innovación educativa basados en modelos educativos integrados (MDI). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Inovação educacional e crescimento profissional dos professores
Abstract: A validação de um modelo educacional pode depender, por um lado, dos resultados da aprendizagem obtidos pelos alunos e do outro, com o entendimento que os professores desenvolvem do mesmo e, consequentemente, a partir do julgamento que expressam.Com referência aos professores, a fim de aumentar o nível de validação, é aconselhável construir uma estrutura de treinamento capaz de garantir um nível adequado de suporte e, ao mesmo tempo, promover uma autonomia aproximada coerente com a prática profissional pré-existente. O artigo discute um modelo de treinamento em duas dimensões em duas dimensões: a) "Estudo teórico versus aplicação prática" b) "suporte versus autonomia".A metodologia proposta foi projetada para o gerenciamento de projetos de inovação educacional baseados em modelos educacionais integrados (MDI). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Arredondo, D.E., & Block, J.H. (1990). Recognizing the connections between thinking skills and mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 4-10
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J.D. & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20, 533-548
Caldwell, S., & Wood, F. (1988). School-based improvement. Are we ready. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 50-53
Cherubini, S. (1991). Marketing dei servizi. Manuale ad uso di dirigenti e consulenti. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967
Cohen E. (1999). Organizzare i gruppi cooperativi. Trento Erickson.
Comoglio, M. (1998). Educare insegnando. Apprendere ad applicare il Cooperative Learning. Roma: LAS.
Costa, A.L., & Garmston R.J. (1994). Cognitive Coaching: A Foundation for Renaissance Schools. Norwood, MA.:Christopher-Cordon Publishers, Inc.
Cruickshank, D.R., & Haeffele, D. (1987). Teacher preparation via protocol material. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), 543-554
Damiano, E. (2006). La nuova alleanza. Temi problemi prospettive della Nuova Ricerca Didattica. Brescia: La Scuola.
Darling-Hammond, L. et. al. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford, Preparing teacher for a changing world (pp. 390-441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Davidson, N., & O’Leary, P.W. (1990). How cooperative learning can enhance mastery teaching. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 30-34
Doyle, D. P. (1992). The challenge, the opportunity. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(7), 512-520. educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 226-234
Elmore, R. F. (1992). Why restructuring alone won’t improve teaching. Educationa Leadership, 49(7), 44-48
Fiedler, M. (1975). Bidirectionality of influence in classroom interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 735-744
Fullan, M.G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers Vollege Press.
Fullan, M.G., Bennett, B., & Rolheiser-Bennett, C. (1989). Linking classroom and school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Associaion.
Fullan, M.G., e Miles, M.B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn’t. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 745-752. Maurizio Gentile 146
Gentile, M (2005). I prodotti della consulenza per il miglioramento dell’istruzione scolastica. In Mandarini, A., Perruca, M. & Salvatore, S., (Edss). Quale psicologia per la scuola del futuro? (pp. 553-564). Roma: Edizioni Carlo Amore.
Gentile, M. & Pisanu, F. (2012). Lavagne interattive multimediali, esperienza digitale percepita e conduzione della classe. Trento: Editore Provincia Autonoma di Trento.
Gentile, M. (1999). La Formazione in servizio degli insegnanti: Indicazioni e scelte operative. ISRE, 6(2), 46-58
Gentile, M., Pisanu, F. & Tabarelli, S. (2012). Personalizzare l’apprendimento nel contesto della classe.T rento: Editore Provincia Autonoma di Trento.
Gliessman, D.H., & Pugh, R.C. (1987). Conceptual instruction and intervention as methods of acquiring teaching skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), 555-563
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re\u0000imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), pp. 273-289
Guskey, T.R. (1984). The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective characteristics of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 245-259. Guskey, T.R. (1990a). Cooperative mastery learning strategies. Elementary School Journal, 91(1), 33-42. Guskey, T.R. (1990b). Integrating innovations. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 11-15
Guskey, T.R. (1991). Enhancing the effectiveness of professional development programs. Journal of Education and Psychological Consultation, 2(3), 239-247
Guskey, T.R. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643
Guskey, T. R. (1995). Professional development in education: In search of optimal mix. In T. R. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Edss). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practice (pp. 114-131). New York: Teachers College Press.
Guskey, T.R., e Huberman, M. (1995). Introduction. In T. R. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Edss). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practice (pp. 1-5). New York: Teachers College Press.
Huberman, M. (1992). Teacher development and instructional mastery. In A. Hargreaves, & M.G. Fullan (Edss). Understanding teacher development (pp. 122-142). New York: Teachers College Press.
Joyce, B., & Clift, R. (1983). Generic training problems: Training elements, socialization, contextual variables, and personality disposition across occupational categories that vary ethos. Montreal: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379-385
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York: Longman.
Joyce, B.R., & Showers, B. (1983). Power in staff development through research on training. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. H. (2008). Teacher learning: the key to Educational Reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(3), 226-234
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G.P. (1994). Goal setting theory. In H. F. J. O’Neil, & M. Drillings (Edss). Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 13-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K.N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152
Macleod, G. (1987). Microteaching: end of a research era? International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), pp. 531-541
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Brandt, R.S. (1990). Integrating instructional programs through dimensions of learning. Educational Leadership, 47, 17-24
McLaughlin, M.W. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspective and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 9, 11-16. Innovazione educativa e crescita professionale dei docenti 147
McRel (Mid-continent Regional Education Laboratory) (1989). A powerful strategy for improving staff development and inservice education. In Wolfe, P. & Robbins, P. (Edss). Opening doors. An introduction to peer coaching, Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Mevarech, Z.R. (1985). The effects of cooperative mastery learning strategies on mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 372-377
Pollard, A. (1997). Reflective teaching in the primary school. A handbook for the classroom. London: Cassel.
Putnam, J., & Johns, B. (1987).The potential of demonstration teaching as a component for teacher preparation and staff development programs. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), 577-588
Rosenholtz, S. (1987). Education reform strategies: Will they increase teacher commitment? American Journal of Education, 95 , 534-562
Showers, B. (1987). The role of coaching in the implementation of innovations. Teacher Education Quarterly, 14, 59-70
Shulman, L.S., & Shulman, J.H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257-271
Smylie, M.A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1-30
Sparks, G.M. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 65-72
Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11-16
Stevenson, R.B. (1987). Staff development for effective secondary schools: A synthesis of research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 233-248
Tilemma, H.H., & Veenman, A.M. (1987). Conceptualizing training methods in teacher education. International Journal of Education Research, 11, 519-529
Tilemma, H.H. (1994). Training and professional expertise: bridging the gap between new information and pre-existing beliefs of teachers. Teaching & teacher Education, 10(6), 601-615
Tilemma, H.H., & Imants, J.G.M. (1995). Training for the professional development of teachers. In T. R. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Edss). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practice (pp. 135-150). New York: Teachers College Press.
Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3, 130-154
Weber, A. (1990). Linking ITIP and the writing process. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 35-39
Zeichner, K.M. (1987). Preparing reflective teachers: an overview of instructional strategies which have been employed in preservice teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), 565-575. Maurizio Gentile 148