Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2015-08-31
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/1746
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/1746/1684
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/1746/1684
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2015-13/2/1746-appreciative-inquiry-a-methodology-revolutionizing-acti
Title: Appreciative Inquiry: A methodology revolutionizing action-research
Abstract: The appreciative inquiry represents the conjugation between generative paradigm and the research action. It is a 'positive revolution'; methodology and epistemology, that which does not solely observe the transformation of the components but also includes the possibility of the generative change for people and organizations(Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005; Cooperrider, Zandee, Godwin, Avital & Boland, 2013). The intent of this article is to further shed light upon how the appreciative inquiry represents a proceduralization of the research-action for the formation and eventual funding of a new paradigm for the school.
Keywords:
Title: Appreciative Inquiry. Una metodologia che rivoluziona la ricerca-azione
Abstract: L'appreciative inquiry (AI) rappresenta la coniugazione tra il paradigma generativo e la ricerca-azione. Si tratta di una "rivoluzione positiva", "metodologica e epistemologica, che non guarda alla sola trasformazione dei comportamenti ma alla possibilità di cambiamento generativo per persone e organizzazioni (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005; Cooperrider, Zandee, Godwin, Avital & Boland, 2013). L'intento di questo articolo è far comprendere come l'appreciative inquiry rappresenti una proceduralizzazione della ricerca-azione per la formazione e fondi un nuovo paradigma per la scuola.
Keywords:
Title: Atquiry appréciable.Une méthodologie qui révolutionne la recherche
Abstract: L'appréciation de l'Equiry (AI) représente la conjugaison entre le paradigme génératif et la recherche-action.Il s'agit d'une "révolution positive", "méthodologique et épistémologique, qui ne regarde pas la seule transformation des comportements mais à la possibilité d'un changement génératif pour les personnes et les organisations (Cooperrider & amp; Whitney, 2005; Cooperrider, Zandee, Godwin, Avital & Amp; Boland, 2013).L'intention de cet article est de savoir clairement comment l'appréciation Eamiry représente une procéduralisation de la recherche pour la formation et finance un nouveau paradigme pour l'école. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Apreciamiento de Atquiry.Una metodología que revoluciona la acción de investigación
Abstract: La apreciación del Equiry (AI) representa la conjugación entre el paradigma generativo y la acción de investigación.Es una "revolución positiva", "metodológica y epistemológica, que no analiza la única transformación de los comportamientos sino a la posibilidad de un cambio generativo para las personas y las organizaciones (Cooperrider & amp; Whitney, 2005; Cooperrider, Zandee, Godwin, Avital & Amp; Boland, 2013).La intención de este artículo es dejar en claro cómo la equiría de apreciación representa una procesalización de la acción de investigación para la capacitación y financia un nuevo paradigma para la escuela. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Apreciativa atletir.Uma metodologia que revoluciona a ação de pesquisa
Abstract: A apreciação da Equiry (AI) representa a conjugação entre o paradigma generativo e a ação de pesquisa.É uma "revolução positiva", "metodológica e epistemológica, que não olha para a única transformação de comportamentos, mas para a possibilidade de mudanças generativas para pessoas e organizações (Cooperrider & amp; Whitney, 2005; Cooperador, Zandee, Godwin, Avital & amp; Boland, 2013).A intenção deste artigo é deixar claro como a apreciação Equiry representa uma processacionalização da ação de pesquisa para o treinamento e financia um novo paradigma para a escola. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Baldacci, M. & Frabboni, F. (2013). Manuale di metodologia della ricerca educativa. Torino: UTET.
Bushe, G. R. (2010). Generativity and the transformational potential of Appreciative Inquiry. In D. Zandee, D.L. Cooperider & M. Avital (Eds.),Organisational generativity: Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, Vol. 3. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Bushe, G. R. (2011). Appreciative Inquiry: Theory and critique. In D. Boje, B. Burnes & J. Hassard (Eds.), The Routledge companion to organizational change (pp.87–103). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Bushe, G. R. (2013). The Appreciative Inquiry Model. In E.H. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of managment theory. London: Sage.
Bushe, G. R., & Paranjpey, N. (2015). Comparing the generativity of problem solving and appreciative inquiry: A field experiment. Journal Of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(3), 309-335. Bushe, G. R. & Kassam A. F. When Is Appreciative Inquiry Transformational? A Meta-Case Analysis. The journal of applied behavioral science, 41 2, June. 161-181
Clarke, H., Egan, B., Fletcher, L. & Ryan, C. (2006). Creating case studies of practice through Appreciative Inquiry. Educational Action Research, 14(3), 407–422
Cooperrider, D. L.,&Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R.W.Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129-169). Stamford, CT: JAI.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Nadia Dario 348 9 SOAR (strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results) is a strategic planning framework for eliciting thoughtful responses from stakeholders regarding the most positive and valuable aspects of their organization. In practice, SOAR could be used to evoke conversations among stakeholders about what they want to discover or learn about within their organization, their desired future for the organization, and how they want to see the organization grow and flourish. These conversations are critical in developing affi rmative topics that ultimately set the agenda for “learning, knowledge sharing, and action” (Cooperrider and Whitney, 2005, p. 17)
Cooperrider, D.L., Zandee, D. P., Godwin L. N., Avital, M. (2013). Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Davies, O. & Lewis, A. (2013). Children as researchers: An Appreciative Inquiry with primaryaged children to improve ‘Talking and Listening’ activities in their class. Educational & Child Psychology, 30. 4
Doveston, M. & Keenaghan, M. (2006). Improving classroom dynamics to support students learning and social inclusion: A collaborative approach. Support for Learning, 21(1), 5–11
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.
Filleul, M. & Rowland, B. (2006). Using Appreciative Inquiry in the Vancouver School District: A positive approach to enhance learning [online]. Available from BC Educational Leadership Research.
Fineman, S. (2006). On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. Academy of Management Review, 31, 270-291
Gergen, K. J. (1978). Toward generative theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1344-1360
Gergen, K. J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York, NY: Springer.
Gheno, S. (2015). La formazione generativa. Un nuovo approccio all’apprendimento e al benessere delle persone e delle organizzazioni. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Hammond, S. (1996). The Thin Book of Appreciative Inquiry. Plano, TX: Thin Book Publishing.
Isaacs, W.N. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Johnson, B. A. (2014). Transformation of Online Teaching Practices through Implementation of Appreciative Inquiry. Online Learning, 18(3)
Golembiewski, R. T. (1998). Appreciating appreciative inquiry: Diagnosis and perspectives on how to do better. In R. Woodman & W. B. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 11, pp. 1-46). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Golembiewski, R. (1999) Fine-tuning Appreciative Inquiry: two ways of circumscribing the concept’s value added. Organisation Development Journal, 77(3), 21–7
Harrison, L.M. & Hasan, S. (2013) Appreciative Inquiry in Teaching and Learning. Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com)
Kozik, P. L., Cooney, B., Vinciguerra, S., Gradel, K., & Black, J. (2009). Promoting Inclusion in Secondary Schools through Appreciative Inquiry. American Secondary Education, 38(1), 77-9
Yballe, L. & O’Connor, D. (2000). Appreciative pedagogy: Constructing positive models for learning. Journal of Management Education, 24(4), 474–483
Marshak, R. J. (2004). Generative conversations: How to use deep listening and transforming talk in coaching and consulting. OD Practitioner, 36(3), 25-29
Martinelli, M. (2013). Appreciative Inquiry come strumento di integrazione degli alunni con disabilità nella scuola. Nuova Ricerca Secondaria. 4
McAdam, E. & Mirza, K. (2009). Drugs, hopes and dreams: Appreciative Inquiry with marginalized young people using drugs and alcohol. Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 175–193
Morsillo, J. & Fisher, A. (2007). Appreciative Inquiry with youth to create meaningful community projects. The Australian Community Psychologist,19(1), 47–61
Pastore S. (2012). Lavoro e apprendimento. Intersezioni didattiche. Milano: Guerini.
Preskill H., Catsambas T. T. (2006). Reframing Evaluation through Appreciative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In: Ortony, A. (ed.). Metaphor and Thought (pp. 254–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stavros, J. M. & Torres, C.B. (2005). Dynamic Relationship: Unleashing The Power Of Appreciative Inquiry In Daily Living, Chagrin Falls: Taos Institute Publications.
Thatchenkery, T., Cooperrider, D. L., & Avital, M. (2010). Positive Design and Appreciative Construction: From Sustainable Development to Sustainable Value. Haward: Emerald Group Publishing. Appreciative Inquiry. Una metodologia che rivoluziona la ricerca-azione 349
Thatchenkery, T., & Meztker, C. (2007). Appreciative Intelligence: Seeing the Mighty Oak in the Acorn. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Trombetta, C. & Rosiello, L. (2001). La ricerca-azione. Il modello di Kuhn Lewin e le sue applicazioni. Trento: Erickson.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Nadia Dario 350