Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2016-08-31
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/1848
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/1848/1772
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/1848/1772
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2016-14/2/1848-evaluation-of-university-teaching-through-students-ques
Title: Evaluation of university teaching through students' questionnaire
Abstract: In recent years, the evaluation of the University has become the focal pointof an intense debate the essential element of which is based on the abilityof the teaching faculty to carrying out its activities; on the one hand the possibility of improvement of the Italian education system in general and, onthe other, the learning outcomes of the students. One of the methods nowadopted by almost all universities in the measurement of the quality ofteaching, is the evaluation of teachers by students. This is completed bymeans of an anonymous questionnaire designed to measure the opinionsof students on the teachings and courses taken, in order to highlight themain positive aspects and also critical aspects, and propose any improvements.The main objective of this article is to underline any eventual problemsrelated to the different use that universities can apply to the outcomesof the student's questionnaires, analyzing the main points of the survey andhighlighting docimological characteristics of the instrument utilized.
Keywords:
Title: La valutazione della didattica universitaria attraverso il questionario studenti
Abstract: Negli ultimi anni la valutazione delle Università è al centro di un intenso dibattito che vede come elemento imprescindibile dal quale partire, il ruolochiave giocato dall'abilità del corpo docente nello svolgere la propria attività;un ruolo importantissimo sul quale viene misurata, da una parte la possibilitàdi miglioramento del sistema di istruzione italiano in generale e, dall'altra,gli esiti di apprendimento degli studenti. Uno degli step seguiti ormaida quasi tutte le Università per misurare la qualità della didattica è la valutazione dei docenti da parte degli studenti. Si tratta di una valutazione perla quale viene impiegato come strumento di rilevazione un questionarioanonimo volto a misurare le opinioni dei ragazzi sugli insegnamenti, al finedi metterne in evidenza punti forti ed aspetti critici e proporre eventualiazioni di miglioramento. L'articolo, partendo dall'analisi dei punti salientidelle indagini fatte intorno al tema della valutazione dei docenti ed evidenziandole caratteristiche docimologiche dello strumento di rilevazione impiegato,ha lo scopo di sottolineare gli eventuali problemi collegati al diversouso che le Università possono fare degli esiti dei questionari-studenti.
Keywords:
Title: Évaluation de l'enseignement universitaire à travers le questionnaire des étudiants
Abstract: Ces dernières années, l'évaluation de l'université est devenue le point focal d'un débat intense dont l'élément essentiel est basé sur les capacités de la faculté d'enseignement à mener à bien ses activités;D'une part, la possibilité d'améliorer le système éducatif italien en général et, d'autre part, les résultats d'apprentissage des étudiants.L'une des méthodes maintenant adoptées par presque toutes les universités dans la mesure de la qualité qui a une enseignement, est l'évaluation des enseignants par les élèves.Ceci est rempli Bymeans d'un questionnaire anonyme conçu pour mesurer les opinions des étudiants sur les enseignements et les cours suivis, afin de mettre en évidence les aspects positifs et également des aspects critiques, et de proposer toute amélioration.l'instrument utilisé. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Evaluación de la enseñanza universitaria a través del cuestionario de los estudiantes
Abstract: En los últimos años, la evaluación de la universidad se ha convertido en el punto focal de un intenso debate, cuyo elemento esencial se basa en la capacidad de la facultad de enseñanza para llevar a cabo sus actividades;Por un lado, la posibilidad de mejorar el sistema educativo italiano en general y, por otro, los resultados de aprendizaje de los estudiantes.Uno de los métodos de hoy en día por casi todas las universidades en la medición de la calidad de equipo, es la evaluación de los maestros por parte de los estudiantes.Esto se completa por los medios de un cuestionario anónimo diseñado para medir las opiniones de los estudiantes sobre las enseñanzas y cursos tomados, para resaltar los aspectos positivos y también aspectos críticos, y proponer cualquier mejoras.instrumento utilizado. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Avaliação do ensino universitário através do questionário dos alunos
Abstract: Nos últimos anos, a avaliação da Universidade se tornou o ponto focal de um intenso debate cujo elemento essencial se baseia na capacidade do corpo docente de ensino de realizar suas atividades;Por um lado, a possibilidade de melhorar o sistema educacional italiano em geral e, por outro, os resultados da aprendizagem dos alunos.Um dos métodos atuais por quase todas as universidades na medição da qualidade de ensino, é a avaliação dos professores pelos alunos.Isso é preenchido por um questionário anônimo projetado para medir as opiniões dos alunos sobre os ensinamentos e cursos realizados, a fim de destacar aspectos positivos e também aspectos críticos e propor as melhorias. O principal objetivo dos destaques é sublinhado para que os problemas sejam relatados, os que podem ser analisados para os que se aplica aos pontos de vista dos estudantes, que podem se aplicar aos pontos de vista do aluno, para que os diferentes pontos de pesquisa sejam os que se destacam, para que os principais dos primeiros, que possam se aplicar, os que se aplicam à pesquisa são os que se destacam, para que os pesquisadores sejam relatados para os que se destacam, para que os principais dos primeiros, que possam se aplicar, os principais pesquisados são os que se destacam, para que os primeiros a se apliquem aos pesquisas e a pesquisa sobre os que se destacam e a pesquisa de que as unidades podem se aplicar aos pontos de pesquisa do aluno que os estudantes do aluno sãoutilizado. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Abrami, P.C. (2001). Improving judgements about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating forms. In M. Theall P. C. Abrami & L. A. Mets (Eds.). The studentratings debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? [Special issue]. New Directions for Institutional Research, 109, 59-87
Abrami, P. C., d’Apollonia, S., & Rosenfield, S. (2007). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In R.P. Perry & J.C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 385-446). Dordecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Abrami, P.C., Leventhal, L., & Perry, R.P. (1982). Educational Seduction. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 446-464
ANVUR – AVA (2013). Proposta operativa per l’avvio delle procedure di rilevamento dell’opinione degli studenti per l’A.A. 2013-2014. Testo aggiornato al 6/11/2013. http://www.anvur.org/attachments/article/26/RilevazioneOpinioneStudDef_06_11_13p df.
Aquario, D. (2007). Università in cambiamento e valutazione. Il punto di vista degli studenti. Padova: CLEUP.
Benton, S.L., & Cashin, W. E. (2012). Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of Research and Literature, IDEA Paper no.50. Manhattan, Kansas State University: The IDEA Center.
Beran, T. N., & Rokosh, J. L. (2009). Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction. Instructional Science. An International Journal of the Learning Sciences. 37(2), 171-184
Braskamp, L., & Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enanching individual and institutional performances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brinko, K.T. (1990). Instructional consultation with feedback in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 65-83
Brockx, B., Spooren, P., & Mortelmans, D. (2011). Taking the grading leniency story to the edge. The influence of student, teacher, and course characteristics on student evaluation of teaching in higher education. Education Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23, 289-306
Cashin, W.E. (1999). Student Rating of Teaching: Uses and Misuses. In P. Seldin (Ed.), Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching. A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions (pp.25-44). Bolton, MA: Anker.
Centra, J.A. (1979). Determining faculty effectiveness: Assessing teaching, research, and service for personnel decisions and improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cohen, P.A. (1983). Comment on A Selective Review of the Validity of Student Ratings of Teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 54(4), 448-458
Crumbley, L., Henry, B., & Kratchman, S. (2001). Students’ perceptions of the teaching of college teaching. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(4), 197-207. Stefania Nirchi 288
ENQA (2005). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki:ENQA. La terza ed. del 2009 è scaricabile da http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ESG_3edition-2.pdf
ESIB - The national unions of students in Europe (2007). Bologna through student eyes 2007 edition. London, UK: Bologna Process Committee 2005 - 2007. European University Association (2006). Annual Report. http://www.eua.be/publications/eua-activity-reports.aspx
Feldman, K.A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: part II. Evidence from student’s evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education, 34(2), 151-211
Feldman, K.A. (2007). Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Rating. In R.P. Perry & J.C. Smart (Eds.). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective (pp. 93-143). Dordrecht: Springer.
Fish, S. (2005). Who is charge here? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(22), p. 2
Franklin, J., & Theall, M. (1989). Who reads ratings: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of users of student ratings of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Galliani, L. (Ed.). (2011). Il docente universitario. Tomo I e II. Lecce: editore.
Giovannini, M.L. (2010). Imparare il “mestiere” di insegnare all’università: orientamenti e sfide. Learning to teach in Higher Education: Directions and challenges. In M.L. Giovannini (Ed.), Insegnare all’Università. Modelli di formazione in Europa. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Approaches and Case Studies in Europe (pp. 1-56). Bologna: CLUEB.
Giovannini, M.L. (2014). Il dibattito su valutazione ed evidenze: per un processo valutativo credibile e trasparente. ECPS Journal, 9, 101-126
Giovannini, M.L., & Rosa A. (2012). La valutazione di impatto dei progetti di formazione all’insegnamento dei docenti universitari: quali indicazioni dalle rassegne delle ricerche empiriche? Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, V(8), 93-104
Greenwald, A.G. (Ed.). (1997). Student rating of professors [Current Issues]. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1182-1225
Gump, S.E. (2007). Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness and Leniency Hypotesis: A Literature Review. Educational Research Quarterly, 30(3), 56-69
Guthrie, E.R. (1954). The evaluation of teaching: A progress report. Seattle: University of Washington.
Kelly, M. (2012). Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness: Considerations for Ontario Universities. Vilfrid Laurier University. http://www.cou.onca/publications/publications-archives/academiccolleaguepapers/pdfs/ac-paper—-student-evaluations-may-23-12
Kulik, J.A. (2001). Student ratings: validity, utility and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research, 109, 9-25
Lalla, M., Frederic P., & Ferrari, D. (2011). Students’ Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: Satisfaction and Related Factors In M. Attanasio & V. Capursi (Eds.), Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of University Systems (pp. 113-129). Berlin Heidelberg DEU: Springer.
Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues and directions for future research. Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388
Marsh, H.W. (2005). La valutazione della didattica da parte degli studenti. In R. Semeraro (Ed.), La valutazione della didattica universitaria in Italia, in Europa, nel mondo. Atti di un convegno internazionale (pp.121-157). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Marsh., H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The Scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp.319-383). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Marsh, H.W., & Roche, .A. (1993). The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 217-251. Evaluation of university teaching through students’ questionnaire 289
Martinez-Gomez, M., Carot Sierra, J.M., Jbaloyes, J., & Zarzo, M. (2011). A multivariate method for analysing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study. Quality & Quantity, 45, 1415-1427
Menges, R.J., & Brinko, K.T. (1986). Effects of Student Evaluation Feedback: A Meta-analysis of Higher Education Research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 16-20, 1986. Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca. Comitato nazionale per la valutazione del sistema universitario (2010). Progettazione, implementazione e validazione di un questionario per la valutazione della didattica erogata a studenti universitari, RdR 2/10. http://www.cnvsu.it/_library/downloadfile.asp?id=11775 Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica. Osservatorio per la valutazione del sistema universitario (1998). Valutazione della didattica da parte degli studenti. RdR 1/98. http://osservatorio.murst.it/didattic.htm
Nasser, F., & Fresko, B. (2002). Faculty views of student evaluation of college teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 187-198
Nasser, F., & Fresko, B. (2006). Predicting student ratings: The relationship between actual student ratings and instructors’ predictions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 1-18
Ory, J.C. (2000). Teaching evaluation: past, present and future. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 83, 13-18
Perry, R.P., & Smart, J.C. (Eds.).(2007). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Pounder, J.S. (2007). Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(2), 178-191
Powell, A.M., Hunt, A., & Irvin, A. (1997). Evaluating of courses by whole student cohorts: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 397- 404. North American Colleges & Teachers of Agriculture (NACTA) Journal, 51(3), 10-14
Remmers, H.H. (1927). The Purdue Rating Scale for Instructors. Educational Administration and Supervision, 6, 399-406
Remmers, H.H. (1928). The relationship between students’ marks and student attitudes towards instructors. School and Society, 28, 759-760
Remmers, H.H. (1930). To what extent do grades influence student ratings of instructors? Journal of Educational Research, 21, 314-316
Remmers, H.H., & Brandenburg, G. C. (1927). Experimental data on the Purdue Rating Scale for instructors. Educational Administration and Supervision, 13, 519- 527
Richardson, J.T.E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387-415
Seldin, P. (1984). Changing practices in faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seldin, P. (1993). The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 39(3), 40
Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating reaching. A practical guide to improved faculty performance for promotion/tenure decisions. Boston, MA: Ancher.
Semeraro, R., & Aquario, D. (2011). L’autovalutazione della didattica da parte dei docenti. Presentazione dei risultati di una ricerca esplorativa condotta presso l’Università di Padova, ECPS Journal, 3, 25-51
Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598-642
Theall, M., Abrami, P.C., & Mets, L.A. (Eds.). (2001). The Student Ratings Debate: Are They Valid? How Can We Best Use them? New Directions for Institutional Research, 109, 1-6
Theall, M., & Franklin, J. (2001). Looking for Bias in All the Wrong Places: A Search for Truth or a Witch Hunt in Student Ratings of Instruction? New Direction for Institutional Research, 109, 45-56
Venette, S., Sellnow, D., & McIntyre, K. (2010). Charting new territory: Assessing the online frontier of student ratings of instruction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 101-115
Wright, R.E. (2006). Student evaluations of faculty: concerns raised in the literature, and possible solutions. College Student Journal, 40(2), 417-422. Stefania Nirchi 290
Wright, S.L., & Jenkins-Guarnieri, M.A. (2012). Student evaluations of teaching combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 683-699
Zambelli, F. (2006). Strumenti e metodi di valutazione: una analisi critica. In R. Semeraro (Ed.). La valutazione della didattica universitaria. Docenti e studenti protagonisti in un percorso di ricerca (pp. 26-60). Milano: FrancoAngeli. Evaluation of university teaching through students’ questionnaire 291