← Back to Home

Teaching online reading with the Think Aloud metacognitive technique

Formazione & insegnamento

ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2016-12-31

This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.

Access and Full Texts

Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/2070

Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data

Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/2070/1940

Full Text HTML (file): missing data

Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/2070/1940

Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2016-14/3/2070-teaching-online-reading-with-the-think-aloud-metacognit

Authors

General Metadata

Metadata (EN)

Title: Teaching online reading with the Think Aloud metacognitive technique

Abstract: This study investigates the opportunity to adopt the Think Aloud metacognitivetechnique to instruct students to become strategic and skilled readersin the online environments. After presenting the historical and theoreticalroots of the Think Aloud and the methodological characteristics of thistechnique, the study proposes an instructional tool that could support lateprimary and secondary school teachers in planning online reading lessonswith the Think Aloud. Finally, the main strengths and weaknesses in the applicationof this technique to the online reading, and the prospects and futuredevelopments of the research in this area are analyzed.

Keywords:

Metadata (IT)

Title: Lettura online e nuove necessità formative. Le opportunità del Think Aloud

Abstract: Nel presente lavoro è indagata l'opportunità di adattare alla lettura negliambienti online la tecnica metacognitiva del Think Aloud, modello di istruzionegià rivelatosi efficace nella comprensione del testo stampato. Dopoaver accennato alle radici storiche e teoriche, e descritto le caratteristichemetodologiche del Think Aloud come strumento di ricerca e come tecnicaper modellare la comprensione del testo, vengono presentati percorsi guidaper l'applicazione di questa tecnica alla lettura online. Nella parte finale,tenuto conto di una pur modesta base conoscitiva, sono illustrati i principalipunti di forza e i limiti nell'applicazione di questa tecnica alla lettura online,nonché le prospettive e gli sviluppi futuri della ricerca in questo ambito.

Keywords:

Metadata (FR)

Title: Lecture en ligne et nouveaux besoins de formation.Pensez aux opportunités à haute voix

Abstract: Dans ce travail, l'opportunité d'adapter la technique métacognitive de Think à haute voix, un modèle d'éducation qui a révélé efficace pour comprendre le texte imprimé, est étudié pour s'adapter à la lecture en ligne.Après avoir mentionné les racines historiques et théoriques, et décrit les caractéristiques de la pensée à haute voix comme un outil de recherche et comme une technique pour modéliser la compréhension du texte, les chemins de guidage sont présentés à l'application de cette technique à la lecture en ligne.Dans la dernière partie, en tenant compte d'une modeste base cognitive, de la force principale et des limites de l'application de cette technique à la lecture en ligne, ainsi que des prospects et des développements futurs de la recherche dans ce domaine sont illustrés. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)

Keywords:

Metadata (ES)

Title: Lectura en línea y nuevas necesidades de capacitación.Piense en voz alta oportunidades

Abstract: En este trabajo, se investiga la oportunidad de adaptar la técnica metacognitiva de pensar en voz alta, el modelo educativo que reveló efectiva para comprender el texto impreso, para adaptarse a la lectura en línea.Después de mencionar las raíces históricas y teóricas, y describió las características de Think Aloud como una herramienta de investigación y como una técnica para modelar la comprensión del texto, las rutas de guía se presentan a la aplicación de esta técnica a la lectura en línea.En la parte final, teniendo en cuenta una modesta base cognitiva, se ilustran la fortaleza principal y los límites en la aplicación de esta técnica a la lectura en línea, así como a las perspectivas y desarrollos futuros de la investigación en esta área. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)

Keywords:

Metadata (PT)

Title: Leitura online e novas necessidades de treinamento.Pense em oportunidades em voz alta

Abstract: Neste trabalho, a oportunidade de adaptar a técnica metacognitiva do Think Aloud, modelo de educação que revelou eficaz na compreensão do texto impresso, é investigado para se adaptar à leitura on -line.Depois de mencionar as raízes históricas e teóricas, e descreveram as características do Think em voz alta como uma ferramenta de pesquisa e como uma técnica para modelar a compreensão do texto, os caminhos de guia são apresentados à aplicação dessa técnica à leitura on -line.Na parte final, levando em consideração uma base cognitiva modesta, a principal força e os limites na aplicação dessa técnica à leitura on -line, bem como as perspectivas e desenvolvimentos futuros de pesquisa nessa área são ilustrados. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)

Keywords:

References

Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B.-Y. (2009). Determining and describing reading strategies: Internet and traditional forms of reading. In S. H. Waters & W. Shneider (Eds.), Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction (pp. 201–225). New York: Guilford Press.

Agosto, D. E. (2002). A model of young people’s decision-making in using the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 24(4), 311-341

Azevedo, R. (2005). Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of SelfRegulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199-209. Stefania Carioli 470

Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535

Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87-111

Botzakis, S. & J. Malloy (2005). ‘South America, Europe, South Africa, Pacific Asia, and North America’. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 112-118

Bruner, J. (1992). La ricerca del significato. Per una psicologia culturale. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

Cardarello, R., (2010). Libri e pratiche di lettura: la comprensione nell’infanzia. In Attraversare boschi narrativi. Tra didattica e formazione. Napoli: Studi sulla Formazione. Liguori.

Carioli, S. (2016). Nel labirinto dei link. Dai “vincoli\u0000 della linearità alla complessità della lettura online. (Tesi di Dottorato non pubblicata), Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione e Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze.

Carioli, S., & Peru, A. (2016). The Think-Aloud approach: A Promising Tool for Online Reading Comprehension. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 8(1), 49-61. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.uriedu/jmle/vol8/iss1/4/

Coiro, J. (2011). Talking About Reading as Thinking: Modeling the Hidden Complexities of Online Reading Comprehension. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 107-115

Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth\u0000grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257

Coiro, J., Coscarelli, C., Maykel, C., & Forzani, E. (2015). Investigating Criteria That Seventh Graders Use to Evaluate the Quality of Online Information. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(1), 1-11; Agosto, D. E. (2002). A model of young people’s decision-making in using the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 24(4), 311-341

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11

Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Newman, S. (1995). L’apprendistato cognitivo. Per insegnare a leggere, scrivere e far di conto (pp. 181-231). In I contesti sociali dell’apprendimento. Acquisire conoscenze a scuola, nel lavoro, nella vita quotidiana. Milano: LED.

Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27(1), 44–47

Dobler, E., & Eagleton, M. B. (2015). Reading the Web: Strategies for Internet Inquiry. New York: Guilford Publications.

Ebner, R. J., & Ehri, L. C. (2013). Vocabulary Learning on the Internet: Using a Structured Think Aloud Procedure. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6), 480-489

Ericsson, K. A., & Fox, M. C. (2011). Thinking Aloud is not a form of introspection but a qualitatively different methodology: reply to Schooler (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 351-354. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (19932). Protocol analysis Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

EU High Level Group. (2012). EU High Level Group of Experts on Literacy.

Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2011). Coaching middle-level teachers to think aloud improves comprehension instruction and student reading achievement. The Teacher Educator, 46(3), 231-243

Galbraith, A., & Alexander, J. (2005). Literacy, self\u0000esteem and locus of control. Support for Learning, 20(1), 28-34

Garbe, C., Holle, K., & Weinhold, S. (2010). ADORE–Teaching Struggling Adolescent Readers in European Countries. Key Elements of Good Practice. Lang: Frankfurt/M, et al.

Gee, J. P. (2009). New digital media and learning as an emerging area and “worked examples” as one way forward. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Goldman, S., Braasch, J., Wiley, J., Graesser, A., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356-381

Hacker, D. (1998). Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 165191). Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.

Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark (DE): International Reading Association.

Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital And Media Literacy. A Plan of Action. Washington (DC): The Aspen Institute.

International Reading Association (2012). Adolescent literacy (Position statement, Rev. 2012 ed.). Newark (DE): Author. Lettura online e nuove necessità formative 471

International Reading Association. (2009). New literacies and 21st- century technologies: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark (DE): Author.

Kuiper, E., Volman M., & Terwel, J. (2009) Developing Web literacy in collaborative inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 52(3), 668-680

Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The Web as an Information Resource in K-12 Education: Strategies for Supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285-328

Kymes, A. (2005). Teaching online comprehension strategies using Think-Alouds. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(6), 492-500

Lapp, D., Fisher, D., & Grant, M. (2008). «You can read this text-I’ll show you how»: Interactive Comprehension Instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(5), 372-383. Leu, D., Forzani, E., Burlingame, C., Kulikowich, J. Sedransk, N., Coiro, J., & Kennedy, C. (2013). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Assessing and preparing students for the 21st century with common core state standards. In S. B. Neuman, & L. B. Gambrell (Eds.), C. Massey (Assoc. Ed.) (2013). Reading instruction in the age of common core standards (pp. 219-236). Newark (DE): International Reading Association. Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (20136). New Literacies: A Dual-Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment. In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark (DE): International Reading Association.

Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Minguela, M., Solé, I., & Pieschl, S. (2015). Flexible Self-Regulated Reading as a Cue for Deep Comprehension: Evidence from Online and Offline Measures. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(5), 721-744

Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 404-419

McGeown, S. P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2015). Exploring the Relationship between Adolescent’s Reading Skills, Reading Motivation and Reading Habits. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 545-569

OECD (2011). PISA 2009 results. Students on line: Digital technologies and performance (Vol. VI)

Ortlieb, E., & Norris, M. (2012). Using the Think-Aloud Strategy to Bolster Reading Comprehension of Science Concepts. Current Issues in Education, 15(1), 1-10. Pressley, G. M., & Harris, K. H. (20062). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 265-286). Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.

Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and Self-Regulated Comprehension. In What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction (Vol. 1, pp. 291-309). Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.

Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). What Readers Can Do When They Read: A Summary of the Results from the On-Line Self-Report Studies of Reading. In Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading (pp. 30–82). Hillsdale (NY): Erlbaum. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. A. (20092). Verbal protocols of reading. The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. New York: Routledge.

Reeves, A. R. (2003). Adolescents Talk about Reading: Exploring Resistance to and Engagement with Text. Newark: International Reading Association. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (20045). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R.B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 640-653). Newark (DE): International Reading Association.

Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Effects of Motivational and Cognitive Variables on Reading Comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 85-106

Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934). Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (20003). Engagement and motivation in reading. In. M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 403–422). New York: Longman.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100

Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. Stefania Carioli 472