Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2017-08-31
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/2584
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/2584/2291
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/2584/2291
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2017-15/2-Suppl/2584-computational-thinking-vs-systemic-learning
Title: Computational thinking vs Systemic learning
Abstract: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are conducive to atransformational renovation of society. For a sustainable society, however, itis necessary to transform the way of thinking beyond ordering, preservingand interacting with the information. Computer science (CS) professionalsalready have a set of conceptual tools designed to solve their problems.This kit is sometimes referred to as "computational thinking". Computationalthinking, however, tends to see the world in terms of a number of problems(or problem-types) that have computational solutions or in any casecan be traced back to known resolution models. In this paper, we try to arguein support of an idea of a bridge needed to unite computationalthought to the practice of sustainability. Sustainability, understood in a systemicsense, is an approach that recognizes the close interrelationship betweentechnology, human behavior and the environment. In the pages thatfollow, we seek to develop, albeit as a sketch, an idea that provides a regionalpedagogical ontology of the sustainable relationship between community,environment and technology starting from a critical analysis of computationalthinking (CT).
Keywords:
Title: Pensiero computazionale vs Apprendimento sistemico
Abstract: Le tecnologie dell'informazione e della comunicazione (TIC) sono portatricidi un cambiamento trasformazionale della società. Per una societàsostenibile è necessario, però, trasformare il modo di pensare oltre chequello di ordinare, conservare e interagire con l'informazione. I professionistidella computer science (CS) hanno già un kit di strumenti concettuali finalizzatialla soluzione dei loro problemi. Questo kit, a volte, viene definitogenericamente come "pensiero computazionale". Il pensiero computazionale,però, tende a vedere il mondo in termini di una serie di problemi(o di problem-tipi) che hanno soluzioni computazionali o comunquepossono essere ricondotti a modelli risolutivi noti. In questo lavoro, si cercadi argomentare a sostengo di una idea di ponte necessario che unisca ilpensiero computazionale alla pratica della sostenibilità. La sostenibilità, intesain senso sistemico, è un approccio che consente di riconoscere la strettainterrelazione-interdipendenza tra tecnologia, comportamento umano eambiente. Nelle pagine che seguono si cerca di sviluppare, sia pure comeabbozzo, una idea che fornisca una ontologia regionale pedagogica dellarelazione sostenibile tra comunità, ambiente e tecnologie a partire da unaanalisi critica del computational thinking (CT).
Keywords:
Title: Pensée informatique vs apprentissage systémique
Abstract: Les technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) sont des portervoricides d'un changement transformationnel dans la société.Pour une entreprise, cependant, il est nécessaire de transformer la façon de penser en plus de commander, de préserver et d'interagir avec les informations.Le professionnel de l'informatique (CS) a déjà un kit d'outils conceptuels finalise la solution pour leurs problèmes.Ce kit, parfois, est défini comme une "pensée informatique".La pensée informatique, cependant, a tendance à voir le monde en termes de série de problèmes (ou de problèmes) qui ont des solutions de calcul ou sont en tout cas retracés à des modèles décisifs connus.Dans ce travail, il est essayé de soutenir l'idée d'un pont nécessaire qu'il unit le calcul de la pratique de la durabilité.La durabilité, intense au sens systémique, est une approche qui vous permet de reconnaître l'interdépendance d'interamenation étroite entre la technologie, le comportement humain et l'ambiance.Dans les pages suivantes, nous essayons de développer, bien que Comabbozzo, une idée qui fournit une ontologie pédagogique régionale de la récupération durable durable entre la communauté, l'environnement et les technologies à partir d'une analyse critique de la pensée informatique (CT). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Pensamiento computacional vs aprendizaje sistémico
Abstract: Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) son los portervoricidas de un cambio transformador en la sociedad.Sin embargo, para una empresa, es necesario transformar la forma de pensar además de ordenar, preservar e interactuar con información.El profesional de la informática (CS) ya tiene un kit de herramientas conceptuales que finaliza la solución para sus problemas.Este kit, a veces, se define como "pensamiento computacional".Sin embargo, el pensamiento computacional tiende a ver el mundo en términos de una serie de problemas (o tietas de problemas) que tienen soluciones computacionales o, en cualquier caso, se remontan a modelos decisivos conocidos.En este trabajo, se intenta argumentar para apoyar una idea de un puente necesario para que une lo computacional para la práctica de la sostenibilidad.La sostenibilidad, intens en sentido sistémico, es un enfoque que le permite reconocer la estrecha interdependencia de la interrementación entre la tecnología, el comportamiento humano y el ambiente.En las siguientes páginas, tratamos de desarrollar, aunque Comabbozzo, una idea que proporciona una ontología pedagógica regional de recuperación sostenible sostenible entre la comunidad, el medio ambiente y las tecnologías a partir de un análisis crítico del pensamiento computacional (CT). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Pensamento computacional versus aprendizado sistêmico
Abstract: As tecnologias de informação e comunicação (TIC) são um portervoricidas de uma mudança transformacional na sociedade.Para uma empresa, no entanto, é necessário transformar a maneira de pensar, além de pedir, preservar e interagir com as informações.O profissional de ciência da computação (CS) já possui um kit de ferramentas conceituais finaliza a solução para seus problemas.Esse kit, às vezes, é definido como "pensamento computacional".O pensamento computacional, no entanto, tende a ver o mundo em termos de uma série de problemas (ou dicas de problemas) que têm soluções computacionais ou, em qualquer caso, são rastreadas até modelos decisivos conhecidos.Neste trabalho, é tentado argumentar para apoiar a idéia de uma ponte necessária que une a computação à prática da sustentabilidade.A sustentabilidade, intensa em sentido sistêmico, é uma abordagem que permite reconhecer a estreita inter-rigidez entre a tecnologia, o comportamento humano e o ambiente.Nas páginas seguintes, tentamos desenvolver, embora comabbozzo, uma idéia que fornece uma ontologia pedagógica regional de recuperação sustentável sustentável entre comunidade, meio ambiente e tecnologias a partir de uma análise crítica do pensamento computacional (TC). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Allan, W., Coulter, B., Denner, J., Erickson, J., Lee, I., Malyn-Smith, J., Martin, F. (2010). Computational thinking for youth. White Paper for the ITEST Small Working Group on Computational Thinking (CT)
Annacontini, G. et alii (2016). Istituzioni di pedagogia e didattica: manuale dell’attualità educativa e sociale. Milano: Pearson.
Arthur W. B., Durlauf S., Lane D., and Lane D. A., (1997). Introduction: Process and Emergence in the Economy. In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, W. B. Arthur and S. Durlauf, Eds. Addison-Wesley.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48- 54
Brennan, K., Valverde, A., Prempeh, J., Roque, R. & Chung, M. (2011). More than code: The significance of social interactions in young people’s development as interactive media Pensiero computazionale vs Apprendimento sistemico 105 creators. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 2147-2156). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, New York.
Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., Druckman, A., Firth, S. K., and Jackson, T. (2013). Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy, vol. 55, pp. 234–250
Dai, L., Vorselen, D., Korolev, K. S., and Gore, J. (2012). Generic Indicators for Loss of Resilience Before a Tipping Point Leading to Population Collapse. Science, vol. 336, no. 6085
Denning, P. J. (2009). Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 6, p. 28, Jun.
Easterbrook, S. M. (1991). Negotiation and the Role of the Requirements Specification. In Quintas, P. (Ed). Social Dimensions of Systems Engineering: People, processes, policies and software development. London: Ellis Horwood, 1993, no. July.
Goguen, J. A. (1992). The Dry and the Wet. In E. Falkenberg, C. Rolland, and E.-S. El-Sayed, (Eds). Information Systems Concepts (pp. 1–17). North Holland: Elsevier.
Gundersson, L. and Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations In Human And Natural Systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems,. 4(5), pp. 390–405, Aug.
Jones, E. (2001). The Trouble with Computational Thinking. [Online]. Available: https://c.ymcdncom/sites/ ww.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/JonesCTOnePager.pdf (ultima visita: 02/10/2017)
Manson, S. M. (2001). Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum, 32(3), pp. 405–414, Aug.
Maslow, A., (1966). The psychology of science: A reconnaissance. Chapel Hill, NC: Maurice Bassett Publishing.
Meadows, D. H. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute, Tech. Rep.
Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. PublicAffairs.
Nuseibeh, B. and Easterbrook, S. M. (2000). Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap. In The Future of Software Engineering. Companion volume to the proceedings of the 22nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE2000), A. C. W. Finkelstein, Ed. Limerick, Ireland: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2000, pp. 35–46
Parisi, D. (2001). Simulazioni. La realtà rifatta nel computer. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Rittel, W. J. and Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, pp. 155–169
Walker, B. H. and Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Weinberg, G. M. (2001), An Introduction to General Systems Theory. New York, NY: Dorset House.
Wing, J. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), pp. 33–35. Demetrio Ria 106