Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2017-08-31
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/2591
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/2591/2298
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/2591/2298
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2017-15/2-Suppl/2591-book-smart-street-smart-not-contrast-anymore-but-encoun
Title: Book smart-Street smart: Not contrast anymore, but encounter and valorization of talents in the new school
Abstract: If with Multiple Intelligences Gardner (1983) theorizes the concept that there aremany types of intelligence and not a single one, it is with Sternberg (1985) thatthe concept of practical intelligence is clearly highlighted, in which we can insertthe so-called street intelligence, the one that lets you handle it in your life.Up to now, only the linguistic-literary and logical-mathematical intelligenceshave been emphasized at school, creating a sort of contrast between book smartand street smart.Starting from the idea, according to which every student (not just someone)owns talents, diversified on the basis of various types of intelligence, a gift thatmust be recognized and cultivated since childhood in order to become excellence, it will be necessary to include in the new school also the so-called street talent or street intelligence.Especially in today's 21st century society, with the Generation Y's Millennials, itis important to enhance the talents of all students. According to Margiotta (1997) and me, this will be possible by identifying their cognitive profile to work on, using the most recent results of neuroscientific research. With the consequent benefit of the exchange between school culture on the one hand, and popular culture on the other.
Keywords:
Title: Book smart-Street smart: non più contrapposizione, ma incontro e valorizzazione dei talenti nella nuova scuola
Abstract: Se con le intelligenze multiple Gardner (1983) teorizza il concetto secondo cuiesistono molti tipi di intelligenze e non un'unica intelligenza, è con Sternberg(1985) che si pone in netta evidenza il concetto di intelligenza pratica, in cui possiamo inserire la cosiddetta intelligenza di strada, quella che consente dicavarsela nella vita. Finora nella scuola sono state valorizzate soprattutto l'intelligenza linguistico-letteraria e logico-matematica, creando una sorta di contrapposizione tra l'intelligenza scolastica e quella di strada.Partendo dall'idea di talento che ogni studente (e non solo qualcuno) possiede,diversificato in base ai vari tipi di intelligenza, dono che deve essere riconosciutoe coltivato fin da piccoli perché possa esprimersi fino all'eccellenza, sarà necessario includere nella nuova scuola anche il talento o intelligenza di strada.Soprattutto nell'attuale società del XXI secolo, con la Generazione Y dei Millennials, è importante valorizzare i talenti di tutti gli studenti. Secondo Margiotta (1997) e me, ciò sarà possibile con l'identificazione del loro profilo cognitivo su cui lavorare, avvalendosi dei risultati più recenti della ricerca neuroscientifica. Con il conseguente beneficio derivante anche dallo scambio tra cultura scolastica da una parte e cultura popolare dall'altra.
Keywords:
Title: Smart-Street Book Smart: pas plus de contraste, mais la rencontre et l'amélioration des talents dans la nouvelle école
Abstract: Si avec plusieurs intelligences Gardner (1983) théorise le concept selon Cuiesi, il existe de nombreux types d'intelligence et non une seule intelligence, c'est avec Sternberg (1985) que le concept d'intelligence pratique est clairement la preuve, dans laquelle nous pouvons insérer l'intelligence de rue So appelée, celle qui vous permet de dire dans la vie.Jusqu'à ce que l'école, surtout, l'intelligence linguistique-littéraire et logique-mathématique, créant une sorte de contraste entre l'école et l'intelligence routière, a été renforcée avant tout, de l'idée de talent que chaque étudiant (et pas seulement quelqu'un) a, diversifié sur la base des différents types d'intelligence, un cadeau qui doit également être reconnu dans la nouvelle école. o Intelligence routière. Surtout dans la société actuelle du 21e siècle, avec la génération Y de la génération Y, il est important d'améliorer les talents de tous les étudiants.Selon Margiotta (1997) et moi, cela sera possible avec l'identification de leur profil cognitif sur lequel travailler, utilisant les résultats les plus récents de la recherche neuroscientifique.Avec le bénéfice qui en résulte également de l'échange entre la culture scolaire d'une part et la culture populaire d'autre part. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Smart-street Book Smart: ya no se contrasta, sino un encuentro y mejora de los talentos en la nueva escuela
Abstract: Si con múltiples inteligencias Gardner (1983) teoriza el concepto de acuerdo con Cuiesi, hay muchos tipos de inteligencia y no una sola inteligencia, es con Sternberg (1985) que el concepto de inteligencia práctica es claramente evidencia, en la que podemos insertar la inteligencia callejera de SO, el que le permite decir en la vida.Hasta que la escuela, sobre todo, la inteligencia lingüística lingüística y lógica-matemática, creando una especie de contraste entre la escuela y la inteligencia de la carretera, se ha mejorado sobre todo, por el camino de la idea del talento que cada estudiante (y solo alguien) se ha diversificado sobre la base de los diversos tipos de inteligencia, un regalo que debe ser reconocido de una edad temprana, por lo que puede expresarlo en sí mismo hasta que también sea necesaria para incluir en la escuela nueva. o Inteligencia en la carretera. Especialmente en la actual Sociedad del siglo XXI, con la generación de Millennials, es importante mejorar los talentos de todos los estudiantes.Según Margiotta (1997) y yo, esto será posible con la identificación de su perfil cognitivo para trabajar, haciendo uso de los resultados más recientes de la investigación neurocientífica.Con el consiguiente beneficio que también se deriva del intercambio entre la cultura escolar, por un lado, y la cultura popular, por el otro. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Livro de rua inteligente Smart: não contrasta mais, mas encontro e aprimoramento de talentos na nova escola
Abstract: Se com várias inteligências Gardner (1983) teoriza o conceito De acordo com Cuiesi, existem muitos tipos de inteligência e não uma única inteligência, é com Sternberg (1985) que o conceito de inteligência prática é claramente evidência, na qual podemos inserir a inteligência de rua tão chamada, aquele que lhe permite dizer na vida.Até a escola, acima de tudo, a inteligência linguística e lógica-matemática, criando uma espécie de contraste entre a escola e a inteligência da estrada, foi aprimorada acima de tudo, a propósito da idéia de talento que cada aluno (e não apenas alguém) é que, em vez, é necessário que ele possa se expressar até os vários tipos de inteligência, que deve ser o que deve ser necessário. o Inteligência da estrada. Especialmente na atual sociedade do século XXI, com a geração Y de millennials, é importante aprimorar os talentos de todos os estudantes.De acordo com Margiotta (1997) e eu, isso será possível com a identificação de seu perfil cognitivo para trabalhar, usando os resultados mais recentes da pesquisa neurocientífica.Com o consequente benefício, também derivado da troca entre a cultura escolar, por um lado, e a cultura popular, por outro. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Brayboy, B.M. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. Urban Rev, 37
Brown, J.H., D’Emidio-Caston M., & Benard B. (2001). Resilience education. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Chase, W.C., & Simon, H.A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol, 4, 55-81
Coleman, L.J. (1997). Studying ordinary events in a field devoted to the extraordinary. Peabody J Educ, 72, 117-32. Diana Olivieri 182
Conchas, G.Q., & Vigil, J.D. (2012). Street smart, school smart: Urban poverty and the education of adolescent boys. New York: Teachers College Press.
Donnison, S. (2004). The ‘digital generation’, technology, and educational change: An uncommon vision. In B. Bartlett, F. Bryer, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Educating: Weaving research into practice. Proc 3rd Ann Int Conf on Cog, Lang and Spec Educ Res, Crowne Plaza, Gold Coast, Queensland, 2-4 December.
Edmunds, A.L., & Noel, K. (2003). Literary precocity: An exceptional case among exceptional cases. Roeper Rev, 25, 185-94
Ericsson K.A., Charness N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. Am Psychol, 49, 725–47
Ericsson, K.A., & Lehmann, A.C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence on maximal adaptations on task constraints. Annu Rev Psychol, 47, 273-305
Ford, D.H., & Lerner, R.M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park: Sage.
Fraser, D.F. (2003). From the playful to the profound: What metaphors tell us about gifted. Roeper Rev, 25, 180-83
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Graff, G. (2001). Hidden intellectualism. Pedagogy, 1, 21-36
Griggs, L., Barney, S., Sederberg, J.B., Collins, E., Keith, S., & Iannacci, L. (2009). Varying pedagogy to address student multiple intelligences. Hum Archit, 7, 55-60
Hatt, B. (2007). Street smarts vs. book smarts: The figured world of smartness in the lives of marginalized, urban youth. The Urban Review, 39
Kezar, A. (2001). The theory of multiple intelligences: Implications for higher education. Innovat High Educ, 26, 141-54
Kornhaber, M., Krechevsky, M., & Gardner, H. (1991). Engaging Intelligence. Educ Psychol, 25, 177-99
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: UCP [Original work published in 1968].
Larkin, J. H. (1982). The cognition of learning physics. A J Phys, 49, 534-41
Larkin, J.H., McDermott, J., Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1980). Modes of competence in solving physics problems. Cogn Sci, 4, 317-45
Leggo, C. (2007). Writing truth in classrooms: Personal revelation and pedagogy. IJWS, 3, 111
Lucas, B., & Claxton, G. (2010). New Kinds of Smart: How The Science Of Learnable Intelligence Is Changing Education: How the Science of Learnable Intelligence is Changing Education. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Int.
Margiotta, U. (1997). Riforma del curricolo e formazione dei talenti. Roma: Armando.
Meier D. (1995). The Power of Their Ideas: Lessons from a Small School in Harlem. Boston: Beacon.
Moltzen, R. (2005). Realising potential: Investigating the life stories of gifted New Zealand adults. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2011). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural Education (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson. Patterson, C. (2003, July 23). Dunedin pupils’ creativity flows onto the page. Otago Daily Times, p. 27
Piechowski, M.M. (2006). “Mellow out”, they say: If I only could. Madison: Yunasa Books.
Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
Potter, E.F., McCormick, C.B., & Busching, B.A. (2001). Academic and life goals: In-sights from adolescent writers. High School J, 85, 45-56
Rabinowitz, M., & Glaser, R. (1985). Cognitive structure and process in highly competent performance. In F.D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 75-98). Washington, DC: APA.
Sheahan, P. (2005). Generation Y: Thriving and surviving with Generation Y at work. Prahran: Hardie Grant.
Singh, H., & O’Boyle, M.W. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction during global-local processing in mathematically gifted adolescents, average-ability youth, and college students. Neuropsychology, 18, 671-77. Book smart-Street smart 183
Sriraman, B. (2004). Gifted ninth graders’ notion of proof: Investigating parallels in approaches of mathematically gifted students and professional mathematicians. JEG, 27, 267-292
St. Clair Hull, J. (2001). An evaluation of the ‘Learning Styles’ approach to Christian education. CEJ, 2
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. New York: CUP.
Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Successful Intelligence: how practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Penguin.
Sternberg, R.J. (2006). Recognizing neglected strengths. Educ Leadership, 64, 30-35
Sternberg, R.J., & Detterman, D.K. (Eds.) (1986). What is Intelligence? Norwood: Ablex.
Turkeltaub, P.E., Eden, G.F., Jones, K.M., & Zeffiro, T.A. (2002). Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage, 16, 76580
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1998). The development of academic talent. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 760. Diana Olivieri 184