Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2018-12-31
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/3099
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/3099/3070
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/3099/3070
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2018-16/3/3099-connectedness-newness-and-democracy-in-schooling-the-le
Title: Connectedness, Newness and Democracy in Schooling. The Lesson of Democracy and Education
Abstract: Over the last couple of decades, the narrative of educational competitiveness and the current climate of economic efficiency, have narrowed down the role of schooling and education, thus reducing their function to that of mere providers of skills and competencies functional to neoliberal educational apparatus. Neoliberal educational agenda, on the one hand, and the spreading Right-wing populism, on the other, grip education and schooling in a kind of claws maneuver that put at risk priceless educational features, such as students' capacity to autonoumously set one's aims and purposes, democratic attitude, and the primacy of the common good. In such a landscape, it is enough clear how a democratic and critical education is cornered.Nonetheless, room for alternative narratives remain. In my paper, by analysing Deweyan oeuvre, I wish to offer an interpretation of education and schooling far removed from the failures of both neoliberalism and populism. Deweyan theory of social intelligence is, in fact, at poles with any reductive conception of education, be such reductivism dependent on neoliberalism or populism. Particularly, Deweyan lesson as it is expressed in Democracy and Education, goes deep into the meaningof interrelatedness and connectedness as essential not just to democratic education, but also to intelligence and self-formation. Otherwise stated, the Deweyan lesson about interconnetedness, democracy, newness and education is of priceless educational value.
Keywords:
Title: Essere in relazione, innovazione e democrazia a scuola. La lezione di Democrazia e educazione
Abstract: A partire almeno dalla fine degli anni Novanta, l'enfasi posta dalle politiche neoliberali sulla competizione e l'efficienza economica ha severamente ridotto il raggio d'azione della scuola, quasi confinandola a fabbrica di competenze funzionali a politiche decise dall'alto, non sottoposte alla discussione e al controllo democratico. A ciò va aggiunta la scalata dei recenti movimenti neo-populisti che, dal lato opposto, erodono il ruolo dell'educazione come formazione della coscienza critica e luogo di condivisione e costruzione del nuovo. La concomitanza di questi due movimentimette all'angolo ogni reale concezione di educazione critica e democratica. In questo lavoro, attraverso l'analisi di parti dell'opera deweyana, chi scrive prova a mostrare come la condivisione è il luogo nel quale non solo si forma la democrazia, ma, più radicalmente, il luogo nel quale l'intelligenza e il sé prendono forma. In tal senso, la lezione deweyana riguarda l'emergenza del nuovo e l'educazione democratica sono di inestimabile valore educativo.
Keywords:
Title: Connectivité, nouveauté et démocratie dans la scolarité.La leçon de démocratie et d'éducation
Abstract: Au cours des deux dernières décennies, le récit de la compétitivité éducative et le climat actuel de l'efficacité économique, ont réduit le rôle de la scolarité et de l'éducation, réduisant ainsi leur fonction à celle des simples prestataires de compétences et de compétences fonctionnelles à l'appareil éducatif néolibéral.Le programme éducatif néolibéral, d'une part, et le populisme de droite répandant, d'autre part, l'éducation et la scolarité de l'adhérence dans une sorte de manœuvre de griffes qui mettent en danger les caractéristiques éducatives inestimables, telles que la capacité des élèves à fixer avec autonomes les objectifs et les objectifs, l'attitude démocratique et la primauté du bien commun.Dans un tel paysage, il est suffisamment clair comment une éducation démocratique et critique est acculée.L'entré même, la place pour des récits alternatifs demeure.Dans mon article, en analysant l'œuvre de Deweyan, je souhaite offrir une interprétation de l'éducation et de la scolarité éloignée des échecs du néolibéralisme et du populisme.La théorie Deweyan de l'intelligence sociale est, en fait, aux pôles avec une conception réductrice de l'éducation, être une telle réductivisme dépendante du néolibéralisme ou du populisme. & NBSP;En particulier, la leçon Deweyan, qui s'exprime dans la démocratie et l'éducation, va profondément dans le sens de l'interdépendance et de la connectivité comme essentiellement non seulement à l'éducation démocratique, mais aussi à l'intelligence et à l'auto-formation.Par ailleurs, la leçon de Deweyan sur l'interconnexion, la démocratie, la nouveauté et l'éducation est d'une valeur éducative inestimable. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Connección, novedad y democracia en la escolarización.La lección de democracia y educación
Abstract: En las últimas décadas, la narración de la competitividad educativa y el clima actual de la eficiencia económica, han reducido el papel de la escolarización y la educación, reduciendo así su función a la de los simples proveedores de habilidades y competencias funcionales a los aparatos educativos neoliberales.La agenda educativa neoliberal, por un lado, y la propagación de populismo de derecha, por otro, la educación de agarre y la educación en una especie de maniobra de garras que ponen en riesgo las características educativas invaluadas, como la capacidad de los estudiantes para establecer de forma autonomática los objetivos y propósitos de uno, la actitud democrática y la primacía del bien común.En un paisaje de este tipo, está suficiente claro cómo se acorralan una educación democrática y crítica. Sin embargo, no quedan espacio para narraciones alternativas.En mi artículo, al analizar la obra de Deweyan, deseo ofrecer una interpretación de la educación y la educación muy alejada de los fracasos del neoliberalismo y el populismo.La teoría de Deweyan de la inteligencia social es, de hecho, en polacos con una concepción reductora de la educación, ser tal reducivismo que depende del neoliberalismo o el populismo. & NBSP;Particularmente, la lección de Deweyan, tal como se expresa en la democracia y la educación, profundiza en el significado de la interrelación y la conexión como esencial no solo para la educación democrática, sino también para la inteligencia y la auto formación.De lo contrario, la lección de Deweyan sobre la interconnetedness, la democracia, la novedad y la educación es de valor educativo invaluable. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Connectação, novidade e democracia na escolaridade.A lição de democracia e educação
Abstract: Nas últimas duas décadas, a narrativa da competitividade educacional e o clima atual da eficiência econômica diminuiu o papel da escolaridade e da educação, reduzindo assim sua função à de meros fornecedores de habilidades e competências funcionais ao aparato educacional neoliberal.Agenda educacional neoliberal, por um lado, e o populismo de direita espalhado, por outro, a educação e a educação em uma espécie de manobra de garras que colocam em risco características educacionais sem preço, como a capacidade dos alunos de definir autonomamente os objetivos e os propósitos, e a primazia do bem com o bem.Nesse cenário, é suficiente claro como uma educação democrática e crítica é encurralada. No entanto, espaço para narrativas alternativas permanecem.No meu artigo, analisando a obra de Deweyan, desejo oferecer uma interpretação da educação e da escola muito distante das falhas do neoliberalismo e do populismo.A teoria da inteligência social de Deweyan é, de fato, em pólos com qualquer concepção redutiva de educação, seja tão redutivismo dependente do neoliberalismo ou do populismo. & Nbsp;Particularmente, a lição de Deweyan, como é expressa na democracia e na educação, aprofunda o significado da inter-relação e a conexão como essenciais não apenas à educação democrática, mas também à inteligência e à auto-formação.Caso contrário, a lição de Deweyan sobre interconexão, democracia, novidade e educação é de valor educacional inestimável. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Alexander, T.M. (1987). John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience, and Nature: The Horizons of Feelings. Albany: State of University New York Press.
Ball, S.J. & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85-96
Bellatalla, L. (1999). John Dewey e la cultura italiana del Novecento. Pisa: ETS.
Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The Location of Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
Biesta, G.J.J. (2004). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 23, 70–82
Biesta G.J.J. (2006). Beyond Learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta G.J.J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G.J.J. (1994). Pragmatism as a Pedagogy of Communicative Action. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13, 273–290
Biesta, G.J.J. (2009). How to Use Pragmatism Pragmatically? E&C/Education & Culture, 25(2), 34-45
Biesta, G.J.J. and Burbules N.C. (2003). Pragmatism and Educational Research. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Boisvert, R.D. (1998). John Dewey: Rethinking Our Time. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Cambi F. & Striano M. (2010). Introduzione, in F. Cambi & M. Striano (Eds.) John Dewey in Italia. La ricezione/ripresa pedagogica (pp. 1-39). Napoli: Liguori.
Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112
Dewey, J. (1882) The metaphysical assumptions of materialism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 16, 208-213
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Boston, New York, Chicago: D.C. Heath & Co.
Dewey, J. (1917). The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy. In J. Dewey et al., Creative Intelligence. Essays In the Pragmatic Attitude (pp. 3-69). New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty: a Study of the Relation between Knowledge and Action. New York: Minton, Balch & Company. Dewey, J. (1929/1925). Experience and Nature. London, George Allen & Unwin. Dewey, J. (1930/1916). Democracy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The MacMillan Company.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company. Dewey, J. (1980/1934). Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dewey, J., Bentley, A.F. (1949) Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.
Di Paolantonio, M. (2016). The Cruel Optimism of Education and Education’s Implication with ‘Passing-on’. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(2), 147-159
English, A. (2013). Discontinuity in Learning. Dewey, Herbart and Education as Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garrison, J. (1994). Realism, Deweyan pragmatism and educational research. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 5-14
Garrison, J. (1996). A Deweyan Theory of Democratic Listening. Educational Theory, 46(4), 429-451
Garrison, J. (1997). Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Garrison, J. (1998). Foucault, Dewey and Self-creation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 30(2), 111-134
Garrison, J. (1999). John Dewey’s theory of practical reasoning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31(3), 291–312
Garrison, J. (2003). Dewey, Derrida and the ‘Double Bind’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(3), 349-362. Vasco d’Agnese 92
Garrison, J. (2005). A Pragmatist Conception of Creative Listening to Emotional Expressions in Dialogues Across Differences (pp. 112-120). In K.R. Howe (Ed.) Philosophy of Education, Urbana, Illinois.
Hill, D. (2004). Books, banks and bullets: Controlling our minds – the global project of imperialistic and militaristic neo-liberalism and its effect on education policy. Policy Futures in Education, 2(3), 504–22. Jackson, P.W. (1994/95). If We Took Dewey’s Aesthetics Seriously, How Would the Arts Be Taught? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13, 193-202
Johnston, J.S. (2002). John Dewey and the Role of Scientific Method in Aesthetic Experience, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, pp. 1–15
Margolis, J. (2010). Heidegger: A Pragmatist by Any Means, in P. Farfield (Ed.), John Dewey and the Continental Philosophy (111-125). Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
Peters, M.A. (2017). The end of neoliberal globalisation and the rise of authoritarian populism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, early view, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2017.1305720, 1-3
Rømer, T.A. (2012). Imagination and Judgment in John Dewey’s Philosophy: Intelligent Transactions in a Democratic Context. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(2), 133150
Rutkowski, D. (2015). The OECD and the local: PISA-based Test for Schools in the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 683–699
Saito, N. (2005). The Gleam of Light: Moral perfectionism and education in Dewey and Emerson. New York: Fordham University Press.
Semetsky, I. (2003). Deleuze’s New Image of Thought, or Dewey Revisited. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 17-29
Semetsky, I. (2008). On the Creative Logic of Education, or: Re-reading Dewey through the Lens of Complexity Science. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40 (1), 83–95
Spadafora G., (2009). The Problem of a Science of Education in John Dewey’s Thought pp. 48-58. In G. Spadafora & L. A. Hickman (Eds.) John Dewey’s Educational Philosophy in International Perspective, Carbondale: SIUP.
Striano, M. (2009). Managing Educational Transformation in the Globalized World: A Deweyan Perspective. Educational Theory, 59, 379-393
Todd, S. (2014) Between Body and Spirit: The Liminality of Pedagogical Relationships. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(2), 232-245
Wilshire, B. (1993). Body-Mind and Subconsciousness: Tragedy in Dewey’s Life and Work. In J.J. Stuhr (Ed.) Philosophy and the reconstruction of Culture (pp. 257-272). Albany: State University of New York Press. Connectedness, Newness and Democracy in Schooling 93