Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2018-12-31
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/3102
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/3102/3075
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/3102/3075
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2018-16/3/3102-il-lato-oscuro-della-valutazione-the-perception-of-eval
Title: "Il lato oscuro della valutazione": The perception of evaluation and assessment in a University context
Abstract: The aim of this contribution is to focus on the reasons for the rejection of evaluation practices in the field of higher education and to understand how this refusal is connected to the "mechanism of unveiling of the educational system" that the evaluation implements. It attempts to provide an interpretative framework regarding the perception of students (but also university professors) of evaluation practices adopted in the university context, proposing to give an explanation that, although provisional, can contribute to the understanding of the refusal that usually accompanies the evaluation, which becomes not only the spy of a malaise but also that of a malfunctioning of teaching.This perception is an intervening factor, often neglected, but important if we want to fully understand the "how, when and why" the learning and the meaning of teaching are realized,and if we want to reveal the reasoning behind the educational action system with which it is possible to clarify the logics that guide the management of the interventions by the teachers.
Keywords:
Title: "Il lato oscuro della valutazione": La percezione della valutazione e dell'assessment in un contesto universitario
Abstract: L'obiettivo di questo contributo è quello di mettere a fuoco le ragioni legate al rifiuto delle pratiche valutative nel campo dell'istruzione superiore e di capire come tale rifiuto sia connesso al "meccanismo di svelamento del sistema didattico" che la valutazione mette in atto.Esso tenta di fornire un quadro interpretativo riguardante la percezione degli studenti (ma anche dei docenti universitari) delle pratiche di valutazione adottate in contesto universitario,proponendosi di dare una spiegazione che, seppur provvisoria, possa offrire un contributo alla comprensione del rifiuto che generalmente accompagna la valutazione, il quale diventa non solo la spia di un malessere ma anche quella di un cattivo funzionamento dell'insegnamento. Tale percezione è un fattore interveniente, spesso trascurato, ma importante se si vuolecomprendere appieno "il come, il quando e il perché" si realizzi l'apprendimento e il senso dell'insegnamento, nonché se si desideri svelare ragionamenti che stanno alla base del sistema d'azione didattico con i quali è possibile chiarire le logiche che guidano la gestione degli interventi da parte dei docenti.
Keywords:
Title: «Il lato oscuro della Valutazione»: la perception de l'évaluation et de l'évaluation dans un contexte universitaire
Abstract: Le but de cette contribution est de se concentrer sur les raisons du rejet des pratiques d'évaluation dans le domaine de l'enseignement supérieur et de comprendre comment ce refus est lié au «mécanisme de dévoilement du système éducatif» que l'évaluation met en œuvre.Il tente de fournir un cadre d'interprétation concernant la perception des étudiants (mais aussi des professeurs d'université) des pratiques d'évaluation adoptées dans le contexte universitaire, proposant de donner une explication qui, bien que provisoire, peut contribuer à la compréhension du refus qui accompagne généralement l'évaluation, qui devient non seulement l'espion d'un malaise mais aussi de la façon dont nous voulons une importance.Le «comment, quand et pourquoi» l'apprentissage et le sens de l'enseignement sont réalisés, et si nous voulons révéler le raisonnement derrière le système d'action éducatif avec lequel il est possible de clarifier les logiques qui guident la gestion des interventions par les enseignants. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: "IL Lato Oscuro della Valutazione": La percepción de la evaluación y la evaluación en un contexto universitario
Abstract: El objetivo de esta contribución es centrarse en las razones del rechazo de las prácticas de evaluación en el campo de la educación superior y comprender cómo este rechazo está conectado con el "mecanismo de inauguración del sistema educativo" que implementa la evaluación.Intenta proporcionar un marco interpretativo con respecto a la percepción de los estudiantes (pero también los profesores universitarios) de las prácticas de evaluación adoptadas en el contexto universitario, proponiendo dar una explicación de que, aunque provisional, puede contribuir a la comprensión de la comprensión de la negativa que generalmente acompaña a la evaluación, que no solo se convierte en el espía de un malestar, sino que también la falta de mal funcionamiento de la enseñanza.Comprenda el "cómo, cuándo y por qué" se realizan el aprendizaje y el significado de la enseñanza, y si queremos revelar el razonamiento detrás del sistema de acción educativa con el que es posible aclarar las lógicas que guían la gestión de las intervenciones por parte de los maestros. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: "Il Lato Oscuro della valutazione": a percepção de avaliação e avaliação em um contexto universitário
Abstract: O objetivo dessa contribuição é se concentrar nas razões para a rejeição das práticas de avaliação no campo do ensino superior e entender como essa recusa está conectada ao "mecanismo de inauguração do sistema educacional" que a avaliação implementa.It attempts to provide an interpretative framework regarding the perception of students (but also university professors) of evaluation practices adopted in the university context, proposing to give an explanation that, although provisional, can contribute to the understanding of the refusal that usually accompanies the evaluation, which becomes not only the spy of a malaise but also that of a malfunctioning of teaching.This perception is an intervening factor, often neglected, but important if we want to fully understand the"Como, quando e por quê" o aprendizado e o significado do ensino são realizados, e se queremos revelar o raciocínio por trás do sistema de ação educacional com o qual é possível esclarecer as lógicas que orientam a gestão das intervenções dos professores. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education, 18(1), 5-25
Bishop, R., & Glynn, T. (1999). Culture counts: changing power relations in education. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90
Bourdieu, P. (1966). Condition de classe et position de classe. European Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 201–223
Briggs, D. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E., & Shepard, L. (2012). Meta-analytic methodology and inferences about the efficacy of formative assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(4), 13-17. Bruner, J. (1996/1997). La cultura dell’educazione. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Calonghi, L. (1976). Valutazione. Brescia: La Scuola. Cardinet, J. (1986a). Evaluation scolaire et mesure. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Wesmael. Cardinet, J. (1986b). Evaluation scolaire et pratique. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Wesmael. Cardinet, J. (1986c). Pour apprécier le travail des élèves. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Wesmael.
Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481. Davies, A. Herbst, S. & Parrott-Reynolds, B. (20122). Leading the way to assessment for learning: a practical guide. Courtenay, BC: Connections Publishing and Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. De Ketele, J.-M. (1993a). Objectifs terminaux d’intégration et transfert des connaissances. In R. Hivon (éd.), L’évaluation des apprentissages. Réflexions, nouvelles tendances et formation (pp. 15-26). Sherbrooke (Canada): CRP. De Ketele, J.-M. (1993b). L’évaluation conjuguée en paradigme. Revue française de pédagogie, 103, 59-80. Antonella Nuzzaci, Anna Salerni, Maria Vittoria Isidori, Alessandro Vaccarelli 128
De Landsheere, G. (1973). Elementi di docimologia. Valutazione continua ed esami. Firenze: La Nuova Italia. Dewey, J. (1960/1939). Teoria della valutazione, con un saggio introduttivo di Aldo Visalberghi. Firenze: La Nuova Italia. Dewey, J. (1994/2016). Democrazia ed educazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Donaldson, S. I., Gooler, L. E., & Scriven, M. (2002). Strategies for managing evaluation anxiety: toward a psychology of program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(3), 261-273
Edler, J., Berger, M., F., Dinges, M., & Gok, A. (2012). The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 167-182
Gattullo, M. (1967). Didattica e docimologia. Misurazione e valutazione nella scuola. Roma: Armando. Gattullo, M. (1986a). Misurare, valutare, decidere. Un modello e tre adattamenti. La Scuola Se, 17-18, 55-58. Gattullo, M. (1986b). Quale università? Proposte per il cambiamento. Scandicci: La Nuova Italia.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports student learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31
Ginsburg, H. P., Jacobs, S. F., & Lopez, L. S. (1993). Assessing mathematical thinking and learning potential in primary grade children. In M. Niss (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education (pp. 157-167). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Giovannini, M. L. (2014). Il dibattito su valutazione ed evidenze: per un processo valutativo credibile e trasparente. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 9(5), 101-126
Gitlin, A., & Smyth, J. (1989). Teacher evaluation. Critical education and transformative alternatives. Lewes: Falmer Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London & New York: Routledge.
Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Beyond use: understanding evaluation’s influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 293-314
Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. (2004)
Heywood, J. (2000), Preface. In J. Heywood (Ed.), Assessment in higher education. Student learning, teaching, programmes and institutions. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
House, E., & Howe, K. (2000). The deliberative democratic view. In K. Ryan and L. DeStefano (eds), Evaluation as a democratic process: promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation, new directions for evaluation (Vol. 85, pp. 3-12). San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: a meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37
Linkon, S. L. (2005). How can assessment work for us? Academe, 91(4), 28-32
Mark, M. M., & Henry, G. T. (2004). The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence. Evaluation, 10(1), 35-57
Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218, DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090
Nuzzaci, A. (2006). Evaluation practices and primary school. A research on how teachers use evaluation at school and students perceive it. 7th EES Biennal Conference Evaluation in Society: critical connections, London, 4-6 ottobre 2006. Abstract 103. From: http://www.europeanevaluationorg /conferences/ees-conferences-and-events.htm Nuzzaci, A. (2007a). Quando la valutazione diventa elemento strategico del processo di insegnamento-apprendimento. In F. Costabile (a cura di), Didattica e didattiche disciplinari (pp. 9-23). Quaderni per la nuova secondaria. Cosenza: Luigi Pellegrini Editore. Nuzzaci, A. (2007b). Usare e regolare l’errore: un’occasione per imparare. In F. Costabile (a “Il lato oscuro della valutazione” 129 cura di), Didattica e didattiche disciplinari (pp. 25-39). Quaderni per la nuova secondaria, 4, Cosenza, Luigi Pellegrini Editore.
Nuzzaci, A. (2014). Valutare per conoscere, per pianificare e per cambiare, ovvero per innovare il sistema d’azione didattico. In M. V. Isidori, I disturbi specifici dell’apprendimento (pp. 197-235). Roma: Anicia. ISBN: 978-88-6709-143-0
Nuzzaci, A. (2015). L’apprendimento della ‘scienza dell’insegnamento’: il test di accesso a Scienze della Formazione Primaria predice il successo nella progettazione didattica? Learning the ‘science of teaching’: Does the access test of Degree Course in Primary Education Sciences predicts the success in instructional design? Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, 8(14), 227-247
Nuzzaci, A. (2016). Promoting and supporting the methodological skills of teachers and trainers for the successful of the teaching and the quality of the training - Scienza dell’insegnamento, formazione e competenze metodologiche dei docenti e dei formatori: dalla progettazione alla valutazione. Formazione & Insegnamento, 14(3), 1736. p – e.
Nuzzaci, A., & Grange, T. (Eds) (2009). Qualità, ricerca, didattica. Quale sistema europeo per l’istruzione superiore? Milano: FrancoAngeli. ISBN: 978-88-568-1320-3
Nuzzaci, A. (2017). L’esperienza del Corso di laurea in Scienze della Formazione primaria aquilano tra intersezioni curricolari, attività formative e processi di qualità. In G. Domenici (a cura di), La formazione degli insegnanti iniziale e in servizio (pp. 148-153). Roma: Armando. Patton, M. Q. (20084). Utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Perrenoud, Ph. (1995). La pédagogie à l’école des différences. Paris: ESF.
Perrenoud, Ph. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in education: principles, policy and practice, 5(1), 85-102. doi:10.1080/0969595980050105
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: the role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249-284). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Popham, W. J. (2004). Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 82-83
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227
Preskill, H. (2008). Evaluation’s second act: a spotlight on learning. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(2), 127-138
Preskill, H., & Boyle, S. (2008). A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 443 459
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). But is it fair? an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in educational evaluation, 23(4), 349-371
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (ed.) Curriculum evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Scriven, M. (1974). Evaluation perspectives and procedures (pp. 68-84). In W. J. Popham (ed.), Evaluation in education: Current applications. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58, 1-107. Scriven, M. (1994a). Evaluation as a discipline. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(1), 147166. Scriven, M. (1994b). The final synthesis. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 367-382. Scriven, M. (1994c). Product evaluation: the state of the art. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 45-62
Segers, M., Dierick, S., & Dochy, F. (2001). Quality standards for new modes of assessment. An exploratory study of the consequential validity of the OverAll test. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(4), 569-586. Antonella Nuzzaci, Anna Salerni, Maria Vittoria Isidori, Alessandro Vaccarelli 130
Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (Eds.) (2003). Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14
Shepard, L. A., Kagan, S. L., & Wurtz, E. (Eds.). (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: National Goals Panel.
Stiggins, R. (1999). Are you assessment literate? The High School Journal, 6(5), 20-23
Stiggins, R. (2002) Assessment crisis: the absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delata Kappan 83(10) 758-65
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325-341
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions in Evaluation, 89(Spring), 7-98
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1967). The use of and abuse of evaluation in Title III. Theory Into Practice, 6(3), 126-33
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1997). A standards-based perspective on evaluation. In R. L. Stake, Advances in program evaluation (Vol. 3): Evaluation and the postmodern dilemma (pp. 61-88). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff. Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H.
O., & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Evaluation models (Rev. ed.). Boston: Kluwer.
Torres, R. T., & Preskill, H. (2001). Evaluation and organizational learning: Past, present and future. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 387-395
Tyler, R. W., Gagne, R. M., & M. Scriven, M. (Eds.) (1967). Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Visalberghi, A. (1955). Misurazione e valutazione nel processo educativo. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità.
Visalberghi, A. (1958). Esperienza e valutazione. Torino: Taylor.
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: for risk and ambiguity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science (pp. 177-210). In D. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: MacMillan.
Wyatt-Smitt, C., Klenowski, V., & Colbert, P. (Eds.) (2014). Designing assessment for quality learning. London: Springer.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Yeh, S. S. (2006). Raising student achievement through rapid assessment and test reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Yeh, S. S. (2007). The cost-effectiveness of five policies for improving student achievement. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(4), 416-436. “Il lato oscuro della valutazione” 131