Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2020-06-30
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/4112
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/4112/3733
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/4112/3733
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2020-18/2/4112-sustainable-assessment-and-feedback-literacy-in-higher-
Title: Sustainable assessment and feedback literacy in higher education. Complexities and dilemmas of an innovative teaching experience
Abstract: Gaining assessment and research skills is crucial to the continuous development of the professionalism of future teachers. To this aim, the most suitable framework is that of sustainable assessment, which may respond both to the learning needs of pre-service teachers and their needs to come in the workplace. To facilitate the acquisition of such skills, students attending the degree course in primary teacher education have been proposed to realize an authentic task together with two specific scaffolding actions: an Assessment as Learning and a feedback literacy path. The results of the mixed-method evaluation research, which could be contextualized in the perspective of the educational assessment and aimed at collecting and understanding the students' perceptions regarding the teaching approach, showed an appreciation for the proposal as a whole. On the one hand, the experimentation intercepted the students' desire to deepen the dimension of the assessment during their studies. On the other hand, a dilemma arose – which deserves tobe further investigated – regarding the complexity of the challenging teaching approach aimed at stimulating students' learning, especially in higher education.
Keywords:
Title: Valutazione sostenibile e feedback literacy in ambito universitario. Una proposta di innovazione didattica, fra complessità e dilemmi
Abstract: È fondamentale, per lo sviluppo continuo della professionalità dei futuri insegnanti, l'acquisizione di competenze valutative e di ricerca. La cornice maggiormente adeguata a tale scopo è quella della valutazione sostenibile, rispondente sia ai bisogni di apprendimento nel presente, sia alle loro necessità a venire nei contesti di lavoro. Per facilitare l'acquisizione di tali competenze è stato proposto agli studenti del corso di laurea in Scienze della formazione primaria un compito autentico, al quale sono state affiancate due specifiche azioni di scaffolding: un percorso di Assessment as Learning, nonché uno di feedback literacy. I risultati della ricerca valutativa mixed-method, contestualizzabile nella prospettiva dell'educational assessment e finalizzata alla raccolta e alla comprensione delle percezioni degli studenti rispetto all'approccio pedagogico-didattico, hanno evidenziato un apprezzamento per la proposta nel suo complesso. Il carico di lavoro è stato tuttavia giudicato eccessivo rispetto ai crediti dell'insegnamento. La sperimentazione, se da un lato ha quindi intercettato il desiderio degli studenti di approfondire la dimensione della valutazione durante il percorso di studi, dall'altro ha visto l'insorgere di un dilemma – che merita di essere ulteriormente approfondito – rispetto alla complessità dei dispositivi pedagogico-didattici sfidanti proposti finalizzati a stimolare l'apprendimento degli studenti nel particolare ambito di formazione universitario.
Keywords:
Title: Évaluation durable et rétroaction d'alphabétisation dans le domaine de l'Université.Une proposition d'innovation didactique, entre la complexité et les dilemmes
Abstract: Pour le développement continu du professionnalisme des futurs enseignants, l'acquisition de compétences d'évaluation et de recherche est fondamentale.Le cadre le plus adéquat à cette fin est celui de l'évaluation durable, répondant à la fois aux besoins d'apprentissage dans le présent et à leurs besoins pour entrer dans des contextes de travail.Pour faciliter l'acquisition de ces compétences, une tâche authentique des sciences du travail primaire a été proposée aux étudiants du cours de diplôme, auquel deux actions d'échafaudage spécifiques ont été rejoints: une évaluation en tant que chemin d'apprentissage, ainsi que celle des commentaires d'alphabétisation.Les résultats de la recherche sur l'évaluation des méthodes mixtes, qui peuvent être contestés dans la perspective de l'évaluation éducative et visant la collecte et la compréhension des perceptions des étudiants en ce qui concerne l'approche pédagogique-didactique, ont mis en évidence une appréciation de la proposition dans son ensemble.Cependant, la charge de travail a été jugée excessive par rapport aux crédits d'enseignement. L'expérimentation, si d'une part, a donc intercepté le désir des étudiants d'approfondir la dimension de l'évaluation au cours du cours d'étude, a ensuite vu l'apparition d'un dilemme - qui mérite d'être approfondi par les dispositifs difficile à la complexité de l'étendue pédagogique. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Evaluación sostenible y retroalimentación de alfabetización en el campo universitario.Una propuesta de innovación didáctica, entre complejidad y dilemas
Abstract: Para el desarrollo continuo del profesionalismo de los futuros maestros, la adquisición de habilidades de evaluación e investigación es fundamental.El marco más adecuado para este propósito es el de una evaluación sostenible, que responde tanto a las necesidades de aprendizaje en el presente como a sus necesidades de entrar en contextos laborales.Para facilitar la adquisición de estas competencias, se propuso una tarea auténtica de las ciencias del trabajo primario a los estudiantes del curso de grado, a la que se han unido dos acciones específicas de andamios: una evaluación como camino de aprendizaje, así como una de retroalimentación de alfabetización.Los resultados de la investigación de evaluación de métodos mixtos, que pueden disputarse en la perspectiva de la evaluación educativa y dirigidos a la recolección y comprensión de las percepciones de los estudiantes con respecto al enfoque pedagógico-didáctico, han destacado una apreciación por la propuesta en su conjunto.Sin embargo, la carga de trabajo fue juzgada excesiva en comparación con los créditos docentes.La experimentación, si, por un lado, interceptó el deseo de los estudiantes de profundizar la dimensión de la evaluación durante el curso de estudio, por otro lado, vio la aparición de un dilema, que merece ser más profundo, comparado con la complejidad de los dispositivos de desafío peridónicos pedagógicos propuestos por el objetivo de estimular el aprendizaje de los estudiantes en el entrenamiento de la universidad en el entrenamiento universitario. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Avaliação sustentável e feedback de alfabetização no campo da universidade.Uma proposta de inovação didática, entre complexidade e dilemas
Abstract: Para o desenvolvimento contínuo do profissionalismo de futuros professores, a aquisição de habilidades de avaliação e pesquisa é fundamental.A estrutura mais adequada para esse fim é a da avaliação sustentável, respondendo tanto às necessidades de aprender no presente quanto às suas necessidades de entrar em contextos de trabalho.Para facilitar a aquisição dessas competências, foi proposta uma tarefa autêntica de ciências do trabalho primário aos alunos do curso de graduação, para o qual duas ações específicas de andaimes foram unidas: uma avaliação como caminho de aprendizado, bem como um dos feedback de alfabetização.Os resultados da pesquisa de avaliação de métodos mistos, que podem ser contestados na perspectiva da avaliação educacional e destinados à coleta e compreensão das percepções dos estudantes em relação à abordagem pedagógica-didática, destacaram uma apreciação pela proposta como um todo.No entanto, a carga de trabalho foi julgada excessiva em comparação com os créditos de ensino.A experimentação, se, por um lado, interceptou, portanto, o desejo dos alunos de aprofundar a dimensão da avaliação durante o curso do estudo, por outro lado, viu o início de um dilema-que merece ser aprofundado ainda mais comparado à complexidade dos estudantes de que os trabalhadores do ensino pedagógico foram propostos. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Andrew, S., & Halcomb, E. J. (2012). Mixed methods research. In S. Borbasi & D. Jackson (Eds.), Navigating the Maze of Research: Enhancing Nursing and Midwifery Practice (pp. 147-166). Marrickville (NSW): Elsevier.
Bayat, K. & Rezaei, A. (2015). Importance of Teachers’ Assessment Literacy. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 2
Bevilacqua, A. (2019). Sperimentare la co-costruzione di un percorso formativo con gli studenti. Che cosa può imparare chi insegna dai loro feedback in itinere? Encyclopaideia, (23)54, 1-14
Biggs, J. (2011). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
Boud, D. & Molloy, E. K. (2013). What is the problem with feedback? In Boud, D. & Molloy, E. (Eds.), Feedback in Higher and Professional Education (pp. 1-10). London: Routledge.
Boud, D. & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400-413
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, (22) 2, 151-167
Boud, D., Ajjawi, R., Dawson, P. & Tai, J. (eds.) (2018). Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work. London: Routledge.
Caena, F. (2014). Initial teacher education in Europe: an overview of policy issues. Brussels: European Commission.
Candy, P.C. (2000). Reaffirming a proud tradition: Universities and lifelong learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1, 101-125
Coolahan, J. (2002). Teacher Education and the Teaching Career in an Era of Lifelong Learning, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 2, OECD Publishing. 166 Alessia Bevilacqua, Claudio Girelli.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
De La Harpe, B. & Radloff, A. (2000). Helping academic staff to integrate professional skills. In Fallows S., Steven C. (Eds.), Integrating key skills in higher education: Employability, transferable skills and learning for life (pp. 165-174). London: Kogan Page.
Dunlap, J.C. (2005). Changes in students’ use of lifelong learning skill during a problembased learning Project. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(1), 5-33
Earl L.M. (2013). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Fletcher, A.K. (2016). Exceeding expectations: scaffolding agentic engagement through assessment as learning, Educational Research, (58)4, 400-419
Gemma C., & Grion V. (2015). Student Voice. Pratiche di partecipazione degli studenti e nuove implicazioni educative. Barletta: Cafagna.
Hager, P.J. (2011). Concepts and definitions of Lifelong Learning. In M. London (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning (pp. 12-25), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Harlen, W., & Gardner, J. (2010). Assessment to support learning. In J. Gardner, W. Harlen, L. Hayward, G. Stobart, & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Developing teacher assessment (pp. 15-28). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Kotsopoulos, D., Mueller, J., & Buzza, D. (2012). Pre-service teacher research: An early acculturation into a research disposition. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(1), 21-36
Kuzu, S., Demir, S., & Canpolat M. (2015). Evaluation of lifelong learning tendencies of preservice teachers in terms of some variables. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11(4), 1089-1105
Malecka, B, Boud, D. & Carless D. (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum, Teaching in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784
Montalbetti, K. (2017). La ricerca come risorsa per l’insegnante. Edetania: estudios y propuestas socio-educativas, 52, 125-143
Mortari L. (2003). Apprendere dall’esperienza: il pensare riflessivo nella formazione. Roma: Carocci.
Munthe, E., & Rogne, M. (2015). Research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 17-24
Nguyen, T.T.H. & Walker, M. (2016). Sustainable assessment for lifelong learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 97-111
OECD, (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Result from TALIS. Paris: OECD.
Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48
Pastore, S. (2017). Cosa serve agli insegnanti per ben valutare. , 17(3), 38-51
Scager, K., Akkerman, S.F, Pilot, A. & Wubbels, T. (2017). Teacher dilemmas in challenging students in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, (22)3, 318-335
Scager, K., Akkerman, S.F, Pilot, A. & Wubbels, T. (2012). Challenging High-Ability Students. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 659-679
Stiggins, R. J. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 22–27
Trinchero R. (2018). Valutazione formante per l’attivazione cognitiva. Spunti per un uso efficace delle tecnologie per apprendere in classe. Italian Journal of Educational Technologies, 26(3), 40-55
Wang, T. H., Wang K. H. & Huang S. C. (2008). Designing a Web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers & Education, 51, 448-462
White, E. (2009). Are you assessment literate? Some fundamental questions regarding effective classroom-based assessment. OnCUE Journal, 3(1), 3-25
Willegems, V., Consuegra, E., Struyven, K., & Engels, N. (2017). Teachers and pre-service tea167 Alessia Bevilacqua, Claudio Girelli chers as partners in collaborative teacher research: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 230-245
Winstone, N.E. & Nash, R.A. (2016). The Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit (DEFT). York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
Winstone, N.E. & Carless, D. (2019). Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education. A Learning-Focused Approach. London: Routledge. 168