Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2021-07-27
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/4904
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/4904/4265
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/4904/4265
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2021-19/2/4904-distance-learning-at-university-in-the-period-of-covid1
Title: Distance learning at university in the period of Covid19 and comparison with the F2F mode of learning: students' perceptions
Abstract: The pandemic caused by Covid19 has imposed on educational and training systems the provision of teaching only at a distance, disregarding the initial choices of students who had chosen their favourite way for following the training courses. In this perspective, this study wanted to explore the differences perceived by students between distance learning and face-to-face teaching (F2F), as well as the perceived effectiveness of the distance learning teaching experienced. The qualitative approach of the study required the preparation of a semi-structured interview addressed to 10 students of a master's degree course at the University of Padova, at the end of a semester of completely remote teaching. The results revealed that, even if the majority of students prefers F2F teaching to satisfy a need for socialization and everyday life, the effectiveness of teaching depends very much on the teaching method and on the level of interaction promoted within the learning community regardless of the way to provide didactics.
Keywords:
Title: Apprendimento a distanza all'università nel periodo del Covid19 e confronto con la modalità F2F: percezioni di studenti e studentesse
Abstract: La pandemia causata dal Covid19 ha imposto ai sistemi educativi e formativi l'erogazione della didattica solo a distanza, disattendendo le scelte iniziali di studenti e studentesse rispetto alle modalità preferite per seguire i percorsi formativi. In tale prospettiva, questo studio ha voluto esplorare le differenze percepite da studenti e studentesse tra didattica a distanza e didattica face-to-face (F2F), oltre all'efficacia percepita dell'esperienza di didattica a distanza sperimentata. Il carattere qualitativo dello studio ha richiesto l'elaborazione di un'intervista semistrutturata rivolta a 10 studenti/esse di un corso di laurea magistrale dell'Università di Padova, a conclusione di un semestre di didattica completamente a distanza. I risultati emersi hanno rilevato che, seppur la maggior parte di studenti/esse preferisce la didattica F2F per soddisfare un bisogno di socializzazione e di quotidianità, l'efficacia della didattica dipende molto dal metodo di insegnamento utilizzato dai docenti e dal livello di interazione promosso, indipendentemente dalla modalità di erogazione della didattica.
Keywords:
Title: Apprentissage à distance à l'université dans la période covide 19 et comparaison avec le mode F2F: perceptions des étudiants et des étudiants
Abstract: La pandémie causée par Covid19 n'a imposé la fourniture de l'enseignement qu'à distance uniquement des systèmes éducatifs et de formation, sans tenir compte des choix initiaux des étudiants et des étudiants par rapport aux méthodes préférées pour suivre les cours de formation.Dans cette perspective, cette étude a voulu explorer les différences perçues par les étudiants et les étudiants entre l'enseignement à distance et l'enseignement en face à face (F2F), en plus de l'efficacité perçue de l'expérience de l'enseignement à distance testée.Le caractère qualitatif de l'étude a demandé l'élaboration d'une entrevue semi-structurée avec 10 étudiants / ils d'un cours de maîtrise de l'Université de Padoue, à la fin d'un semestre d'enseignement à distance.Les résultats qui ont émergé ont noté que, bien que la plupart des étudiants / ils préfèrent l'enseignement F2F pour répondre à un besoin de socialisation et de vie quotidienne, l'efficacité de l'enseignement dépend beaucoup de la méthode d'enseignement utilisée par les enseignants et du niveau d'interaction promu, quelle que soit la méthode de fourniture d'enseignement. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Aprendizaje a distancia en la universidad en el período Covid 19 y comparación con el modo F2F: percepciones de estudiantes y estudiantes
Abstract: La pandemia causada por Covid19 ha impuesto la provisión de enseñanza solo a una distancia solo a los sistemas educativos y de capacitación, ignorando las opciones iniciales de estudiantes y estudiantes en comparación con los métodos favoritos para seguir los cursos de capacitación.En esta perspectiva, este estudio quería explorar las diferencias percibidas por los estudiantes y los estudiantes entre la enseñanza a distancia y la enseñanza de la cara a cara (F2F), además de la efectividad percibida de la experiencia de la enseñanza a una distancia probada.El carácter cualitativo del estudio solicitó la elaboración de una entrevista semiestructurada con 10 estudiantes/ellos de un curso de maestría de la Universidad de Padua, al final de un semestre de enseñanza completamente a distancia.Los resultados que surgieron han señalado que, aunque la mayoría de los estudiantes/prefieren la enseñanza de F2F para satisfacer la necesidad de socialización y vida cotidiana, la efectividad de la enseñanza depende mucho del método de enseñanza utilizado por los maestros y el nivel de interacción promovido, independientemente del método de proporcionar enseñanza. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Title: Aprendizado a distância na universidade no período Covid 19 e comparação com o modo F2F: percepções de estudantes e estudantes
Abstract: A pandemia causada pelo Covid19 impôs o fornecimento de ensino apenas à distância apenas aos sistemas educacionais e de treinamento, desconsiderando as escolhas iniciais de estudantes e estudantes em comparação com os métodos favoritos para seguir os cursos de treinamento.Nesta perspectiva, este estudo queria explorar as diferenças percebidas por estudantes e estudantes entre o ensino a distância e o ensino de face ao rosto (F2F), além da eficácia percebida da experiência do ensino a uma distância testada.O caráter qualitativo do estudo solicitou a elaboração de uma entrevista semi -estruturada com 10 alunos/eles de um curso de mestrado da Universidade de Pádua, no final de um semestre de ensino completamente à distância.Os resultados que surgiram observaram que, embora a maioria dos alunos/eles preferem o ensino da F2F para atender à necessidade de socialização e vida cotidiana, a eficácia do ensino depende muito do método de ensino usado pelos professores e do nível de interação promovido, independentemente do método de fornecer ensino. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords:
Abdal-Haqq, I. (1998). Constructivism in teacher education: Considerations for those who would link practice to theory.ERIC Digest, ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97
Baker, C. (2010). The Impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1-30
Brescia, W. F. (2003). A Support Taxonomy for Improving Online Discussions. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(4) 289-298
Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 73-88
De Jong, N., Verstegen, D. M. L., Tan, F. E. S., & O’connor, S. J. (2013). A comparison of classroom and online asynchronous problem-based learning for students undertaking statistics training as part of a Public Health Masters’ degree. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(2), 245-264. Dimeff, L. A., Harned, M. S., Woodcock, E. A., Skutch, J. M., Koerner, K., & Linehan, M. M. 109 Concetta Tino, Ambra Stefanini (2015). Investigating bang for your training buck: a randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of training clinicians in two core strategies of dialectical behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 46(3), 283-295
Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 31233. Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B. W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., & Edelson,.
D. C. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of teacher education, 64(5), 426438
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 31-36
Garrison, D. R., & Shale, D. (1990). Education at a distance: From issues to practice. Melbourne, FL: Krieger.
Jaggars, S. S., Edgecombe, N., & Stacey, G. W. (2013). What We Know about Online Course Outcomes. Research Overview. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
Johnson, C., & Brescia Jr, W. (2006). Connecting, Making Meaning, and Learning in the Electronic Classroom: Reflections on Facilitating Learning at a Distance. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 56-74
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70
Larson, D. K., & Sung, C. H. (2009). Comparing student performance: Online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31-42
Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549-565
Machtmes, K., & Asher, J. W. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Telecourses in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 27-46
McAlpine, I. (2000). Collaborative learning online. Distance Education, 21(1), 66 – 80
McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face to face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of advanced nursing, 71(2), 255-270
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Johnson, D. M., & Palmer, C. C. (2015). Comparing student assessments and perceptions of online and face-to-face versions of an introductory linguistics course. Online Learning Journal, 19(2),1-18
Palmer, L., O’Donnell, J. M., Ren, D., & Henker, R. (2014). Comparison of Nurse Anesthesia Student 12 Lead EKG Knowledge, Interpretation Skill, Satisfaction and Attitude: Traditional Instruction vs. Asynchronous Online Video Lecture. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(3)
Pereira, A. S., & Wahi, M. M. (2018). Comparison of didactic, technical, role modeling, and ethics learning acquisition in undergraduate online versus face-to-face modalities. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 18(5)
Porter, A. L., Pitterle, M. E., & Hayney, M. S. (2014). Comparison of online versus classroom delivery of an immunization elective course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 1-9
Restauri, S. L. (2006). Faculty-student interaction components in online education: What are the effects on student satisfaction and academic outcomes? (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University)
Ranieri, M., Raffaghelli, J., & Pezzati, F. (2018). Digital resources for faculty development in e-learning: a self-paced approach for professional learning. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 104-118. 110 Concetta Tino, Ambra Stefanini.
Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, University of North Carolina.
Tarozzi, M. (2008). Che cos’ è la grounded theory. Roma: Carocci.
Tichavsky, L. P., Hunt, A. N., Driscoll, A., & Jicha, K. (2015). It’s Just Nice Having a Real Teacher: Student Perceptions of Online versus Face-to-Face Instruction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 1-10
Trinchero, R. (2002). Manuale di ricerca educativa. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Ullah, H., & Wilson, M. A. (2007). Students’ academic success and its association to student involvement with learning and relationships with faculty and peers. College Student Journal, 41(4), 1192-1203
Vrasidas, C. and Glass, G. V. (2002), A conceptual framework for studying distance education.In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass (eds) Current Perspectives in Applied Information Technologies: Distance Education and Distributed Learning (pp. 31–56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). SanFrancisco: Jossey Bass.
Wright, B. M. (2017). Blended learning: Student perception of face-to-face and online EFL lessons. Indonesian journal of applied linguistics, 7(1), 64-71
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836. 111