Which assessment do university students experience? First results from a field research

Formazione & insegnamento

ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2022-08-30

This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.

Access and Full Texts

Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/5745

Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data

Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/5745/5028

Full Text HTML (file): missing data

Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/5745/5028

Full Text XML: missing data

Alternate URL: https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2022-20/2/5745-which-assessment-do-university-students-experience-firs.html

Authors

General Metadata

Metadata (EN)

Title: Which assessment do university students experience? First results from a field research

Abstract: In the scientific debate assessment is considered a co-extensive dimension to the learning process and a driver to promote it; at the same time, teaching how to assess and self-assess is an expected result for the university training in order to assure students lifelong learning. In this conceptual framework the empirical research aims to describe students' assessment experience paying attention to the implications due to pandemic. Thanks to students' voice perspective they are considered as competent actors able to suggest ideas for outlining improvement paths. The evidence collected on the field gives a lights and shadows portrait; overall, we have to work both on representations as well as practices: to make assessment for learning practices systematic, sustainable and recognizable by the students it's necessary a joint effort of the different actors taking into account all aspects involved (scientific, didactic, organizational).

Keywords: Assessment; Interview; Learning; Research; Student Voice

Metadata (IT)

Title: Di quale valutazione fanno esperienza gli studenti universitari? Primi esiti da una ricerca esplorativa

Abstract: Nel dibattito scientifico vi è un'ampia convergenza nel considerare la valutazione come una dimensione coestensiva al processo di apprendimento e come una leva preziosa per promuoverlo; al tempo stesso, fra gli obiettivi formativi trasversali del percorso universitario rientra la progressiva acquisizione della capacità di valutare e valutarsi considerata come un asset strategico nel quadro dello sviluppo delle competenze chiave per l'apprendimento permanente. Guidata da tali riferimenti teorico-concettuali la ricerca esplorativa di cui si dà conto intende offrire uno spaccato della valutazione vissuta nel contesto universitario con un'attenzione particolare alle implicazioni legate al periodo pandemico. La scelta di ricostruire l'oggetto di indagine dal punto di vista degli studenti mira a dare voce a costoro considerandoli come attori competenti in grado non solo di descrivere ma anche di suggerire spunti per delineare piste migliorative. Dalle evidenze rilevate sul campo emerge un ritratto fatto di luci ma anche di ombre; nel complesso, si configura l'esigenza di lavorare sia sul piano delle rappresentazioni sia su quello delle prassi: soltanto uno sforzo congiunto di tutti gli attori entro un orizzonte che tenga in conto tutti gli aspetti (scientifico, didattico, organizzativo) potrà consentire di rendere la valutazione per l'apprendimento una pratica sistematica, sostenibile e riconoscibile poiché radicata all'interno delle situazioni valutative reali.

Keywords: Apprendimento; Intervista; Ricerca; Student Voice; Valutazione

Metadata (FR)

Title: Quelle évaluation éprouve les étudiants universitaires?Premier résultat d'une recherche sur le terrain

Abstract: Dans le débat scientifique, l'évaluation est considérée comme une dimension co-étendue au processus d'apprentissage et un moteur pour la promouvoir;Dans le même temps, enseigner à l'évaluation et à l'auto-évaluation est un résultat attendu pour la formation universitaire afin d'assurer l'apprentissage tout au long de la vie.Dans ce cadre conceptuel, la recherche empirique vise à décrire l'expérience d'évaluation des étudiants en faisant attention aux implications dues à la pandémie.Grâce à la perspective de la voix des étudiants, ils sont considérés comme des acteurs compétents capables de suggérer des idées pour décrire les chemins d'amélioration. & NBSP; Les preuves recueillies sur le terrain donnent un portrait de lumières et d'ombres;Dans l'ensemble, nous devons travailler à la fois sur les représentations que sur les pratiques: pour faire de l'évaluation des pratiques d'apprentissage systématique, durable et reconnaissable par les étudiants, il faut un effort conjoint des différents acteurs en tenant compte de tous les aspects impliqués (scientifique, didactique, organisationnel). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)

Keywords: Évaluation;Entretien;Apprentissage;Recherche;Voix étudiante

Metadata (ES)

Title: ¿Qué evaluación experimentan los estudiantes universitarios?Primeros resultados de una investigación de campo

Abstract: En la evaluación del debate científico se considera una dimensión coextensiva para el proceso de aprendizaje y un conductor para promoverlo;Al mismo tiempo, la enseñanza de cómo evaluar y la autoevaluación es un resultado esperado para la capacitación universitaria para asegurar a los estudiantes el aprendizaje de por vida.En este marco conceptual, la investigación empírica tiene como objetivo describir la experiencia de evaluación de los estudiantes prestando atención a las implicaciones debido a la pandemia.Gracias a la perspectiva de voz de los estudiantes, se consideran actores competentes capaces de sugerir ideas para delinear caminos de mejora. & Nbsp; La evidencia recopilada en el campo da un retrato de luces y sombras;En general, tenemos que trabajar tanto en representaciones como en prácticas: para hacer una evaluación para las prácticas de aprendizaje sistemáticas, sostenibles y reconocibles por los estudiantes, es necesario un esfuerzo conjunto de los diferentes actores que tienen en cuenta todos los aspectos involucrados (científicos, didácticos, organizacionales). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)

Keywords: Evaluación;Entrevista;Aprendiendo;Investigación;Voz de estudiante

Metadata (PT)

Title: Qual avaliação os estudantes universitários experimentam?Primeiros resultados de uma pesquisa de campo

Abstract: Na avaliação do debate científico, é considerado uma dimensão co-extensa no processo de aprendizagem e um motorista para promovê-lo;Ao mesmo tempo, ensinar como avaliar e autoavaliar é um resultado esperado para o treinamento da universidade, a fim de garantir a aprendizagem ao longo da vida dos alunos.Nesta estrutura conceitual, a pesquisa empírica visa descrever a experiência de avaliação dos alunos prestando atenção às implicações devido à pandemia.Graças à perspectiva de voz dos alunos, eles são considerados atores competentes capazes de sugerir idéias para descrever caminhos de melhoria...No geral, temos que trabalhar tanto em representações quanto em práticas: fazer avaliação para práticas de aprendizagem sistemáticas, sustentáveis ​​e reconhecíveis pelos alunos, é necessário um esforço conjunto dos diferentes atores levando em consideração todos os aspectos envolvidos (científicos, didáticos, organizacionais). (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)

Keywords: Avaliação;Entrevista;Aprendizado;Pesquisar;Voz do aluno

References

Allan, S. (2020). Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners' experiences with online exams. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2279. DOI: 10.25304/rlt.v28.2279.

Bellomo, L. (2013). Il processo di valutazione nel contesto scolastico: uno studio esplorativo sulle credenze e le pratiche didattico-valutative in un gruppo di insegnanti di scuola primaria. FORMAZIONE & INSEGNAMENTO. Rivista internazionale di Scienze dell'educazione e della formazione, 11(1), 167-174.

Black, P. (2006). Assessment for learning: where is it now? Where is it going? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning through Assessment (pp. 9-20). Oxford: Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Blair, E., & Valdez Noel, K. (2014). Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 879-894.

Boud, D. (2006). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22 (2), 151-167.

Boud, D., & Associates (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Abingond: Routledge.

Brookhart, S.S., & Bronowicz, D.L. (2003). I don't like writing. It makes my fingers hurt: Students talk about their classroom assessments. Assessment in Education, 10, 302-315.

Brown, G.T.L. (2004). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education, 11, 221-242.

Brown, G.T.L., Hirschfeld, G.H.F. (2008). Students' conceptions of assessment: links to outcomes. Assessment in Education, 15, 63-74.

Brown, G.T.L., Irving, S.E., & Peterson, E.R. (2008). Beliefs that make a difference: students' conceptions of assessment and academic performance. Assessment in Education, 3-17.

Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18, 32-42.

Brown, S. (2005). Assessment for Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 81-89.

Coggi, C. (2005). Valutare gli studenti: problemi teorici e prassi nella facoltà. In: C Coggi (Ed), Per migliorare la didattica universitaria (pp. 205-238). Lecce: Pensa Multi- Media.

Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum journal, 16 (2), 137-151.

Earl, A.M. (2003). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Gibbs, G. (2010). Using assessment to support student learning. Leeds: Leeds Met Press.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, 1, 3-31.

Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students' assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference. Educational Studies, 32, 399-409.

Grion, V., & Cook-Sather, A. (Eds). (2013). Student voice. Prospettive internazionali e pratiche emergenti in Italia. Milano: Guerini.

Grion, V., Serbati, A., Sambell, K., & Brown, S. (2020). Valutazione e feedback in DAD in tempo di emergenza: strategie d'azione nei contesti universitari (pp. 75-90). In Limone P., Toto G, & Sansone N, a cura di, Didattica universitaria a distanza: tra emergenza e futuro. Bari: Progedit.

Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher education, 27(1), 27-52.

McDowell, L., Sambell, K., & Davison, G. (2009). Assessment for learning: a brief history and review of terminology. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning Through the Curriculum (pp. 56-64). Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Montalbetti, K. (2020). Apprendere la competenza valutativa a scuola: un asset strategico per la vita, Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, (24), 54-66.

Montalbetti, K. (2021). Innovare la valutazione all'università: si può, anzi si deve!. Education Sciences & Society, 12(2), 359-379.

Montalbetti, K., & Orizio, E. (2022). Innovare la didattica universitaria fra vincoli e opportunità. Un'esperienza di peer feedback con i futuri insegnanti. Qwerty. Rivista interdisciplinare di tecnologia, cultura e formazione, 17, 1, 45-64. DOI: 10.30557/QW000050

Pastore, S. (2012). Silent assessment? Cosa pensano della valutazione gli studenti universitari. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 62-73.

Perla, L., Felisatti, E., Grion, V., Agrati, L.S., Gallelli, R., Vinci, V., Amati, I., & Bonelli, R. (2020). Oltre l'era Covid-19: dall'emergenza alle prospettive di sviluppo professionale. Excellence and Innovation in Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 18-37. DOI: 10.3280/exioa2-2020oa10802.

Romainville, M. (2004). Esquisse d'une didactique universitaire. Revue francophone de gestion, 5(24), 1-15.

Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning: how can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices?. Active learning in higher education, 3(2), 145-158.

Seale, J. (2010). Doing student voice work in higher education: an exploration of the value of participatory methods. British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), 995-1015.

Semeraro, R. (2011). La didattica universitaria e la sua valutazione: concezioni e pratiche dei docenti. In L. Galliani (Ed.), Il docente universitario. Una professione tra ricerca, didattica e governance degli Atenei. (Tomo I, pp. 119-136). Lecce-Brescia: Pensa MultiMedia.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. USA: SAGE publications.