Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2022-12-30
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/5817
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/5817/5302
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/5817/5302
Full Text XML: missing data
Alternate URL: https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2022-20/3/5817-mind-the-gap-exploring-teachers-professional-learning-n.html
Title: Mind the gap! Exploring teachers professional learning needs to cultivate critical data literacies
Abstract: Critical Data Literacy as approach to the emergent problem of datafication requires teachers' skills and awareness. However, this professional learning need appears to be overlooked. Our study aims at exploring teachers' discourses in an attempt to map out professional practices and identify learning needs, therefore the metaphor of "Mind the Gap" was used. We adopted a mixed-methods, constructionist inquiry along three phases (106, 39 and 49 participants respectively) embedded into a transnational project on critical digital literacies (CDL) involving Finland, Italy, Spain, and the UK. The focus was placed on re-defining critical data literacy components and dimensions and identifying gaps in relation to teachers' professional learning needs. The results indicate that data literacy was not as present as other dimensions across the teachers' accounts about the most immediate and relevant "data" problems. This has clear implications regarding the need to face teachers' professional development to embrace critical data practices within a digital context that evolves.
Keywords: Constructionist Research; Critical Data Literacy; Critical digital literacy; Teachers' professional knowledge
Title: Mind the gap! Esplorare il fabbisogno formativo degli insegnanti per sviluppare forme di alfabetizzazione critica ai dati
Abstract: L'alfabetizzazione critica ai dati è un approccio al problema emergente della dataficazione, che richiede competenze e consapevolezza da parte degli insegnanti. Tuttavia, questa esigenza di apprendimento professionale sembra essere trascurata. Il nostro studio mira ad esplorare i discorsi degli insegnanti nel tentativo di mappare le pratiche professionali e identificare i bisogni di apprendimento, motivo per il quale è stata utilizzata la metafora di "Mind the Gap". Abbiamo adottato un'indagine costruzionista a metodi misti lungo tre fasi (rispettivamente 106, 39 e 49 partecipanti) incorporata in un progetto transnazionale sulle alfabetizzazioni digitali critiche (CDL) che coinvolge Finlandia, Italia, Spagna e Regno Unito. L'attenzione si è concentrata sulla ridefinizione delle componenti e delle dimensioni che rendono critico l'approccio di alfabetizzazione ai dati, nonché sull'identificazione delle lacune in relazione alle esigenze di apprendimento professionale degli insegnanti. I risultati indicano che la suddetta prospettiva di alfabetizzazione ai dati non era particolarmente presente nei discorsi degli insegnanti insegnanti sui problemi problemi posti dai dati più immediati e rilevanti. Ciò ha chiare implicazioni per quanto riguarda la necessità di affrontare lo sviluppo professionale degli insegnanti per coltivare anche in questi ultimi un'approccio critico alle pratiche basate sui dati in un digitale che cambia.
Keywords: Alfabetizzazione critica ai dati; Competenza digitale critica; Ricerca costruzionista; Sviluppo professionale docente
Title: Attention à l'écart!Explorer les enseignants que l'apprentissage professionnel doit cultiver les littératies de données critiques
Abstract: La maîtrise des données critiques en tant qu'approche du problème émergent de la données nécessite les compétences et la sensibilisation des enseignants.Cependant, ce besoin d'apprentissage professionnel semble être négligé. & NBSP;Notre étude vise à explorer les discours des enseignants dans le but de cartographier les pratiques professionnelles et d'identifier les besoins d'apprentissage, donc la métaphore de «l'esprit l'écart» a été utilisée.Nous avons adopté une enquête dans les méthodes mixtes, selon trois phases (106, 39 et 49 participants) intégrées dans un projet transnational sur les littératies numériques critiques (CDL) impliquant la Finlande, l'Italie, l'Espagne et le Royaume-Uni. & NBSP;L'objectif a été mis sur la redéfinition des composants et des dimensions de la littératie des données critiques et de l'identification des lacunes concernant les besoins d'apprentissage professionnel des enseignants. & NBSP;Les résultats indiquent que la littératie des données n'était pas aussi présente que d'autres dimensions à travers les comptes des enseignants sur les problèmes de «données» les plus immédiats et les plus pertinents.Cela a des implications claires concernant la nécessité de faire face au développement professionnel des enseignants pour adopter des pratiques de données critiques dans un contexte numérique qui évolue. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Recherche constructionniste;La littératie critique des données;L'alphabétisation numérique critique;Connaissances professionnelles des enseignants
Title: ¡Cuida la brecha!Explorar el aprendizaje profesional de los maestros necesita cultivar alfabetizaciones de datos críticos
Abstract: La alfabetización crítica de datos como enfoque para el problema emergente de datos de datos requiere las habilidades y la conciencia de los maestros.Sin embargo, esta necesidad de aprendizaje profesional parece ser pasada por alto. & NBSP;Nuestro estudio tiene como objetivo explorar los discursos de los maestros en un intento de mapear las prácticas profesionales e identificar las necesidades de aprendizaje, por lo tanto, se utilizó la metáfora de "Mind the Gap".Adoptamos una investigación construccionista de métodos mixtos a lo largo de tres fases (106, 39 y 49 participantes respectivamente) integrados en un proyecto transnacional sobre alfabetizaciones digitales críticas (CDL) que involucran a Finlandia, Italia, España y el Reino Unido. & NBSP;El enfoque se centró en redefinir componentes y dimensiones críticas de alfabetización de datos e identificar brechas en relación con las necesidades de aprendizaje profesional de los maestros. & NBSP;Los resultados indican que la alfabetización de datos no fue tan presente como otras dimensiones en las cuentas de los maestros sobre los problemas de "datos" más inmediatos y relevantes.Esto tiene implicaciones claras con respecto a la necesidad de enfrentar el desarrollo profesional de los maestros para adoptar prácticas de datos críticos dentro de un contexto digital que evoluciona. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Investigación construccionista;Alfabetización crítica de datos;Alfabetización digital crítica;Conocimiento profesional de los maestros
Title: Cuide da lacuna!Explorando os professores A aprendizagem profissional precisa cultivar literacias de dados críticos
Abstract: A alfabetização crítica de dados como abordagem para o problema emergente de DataFication requer habilidades e conscientização dos professores.No entanto, essa necessidade de aprendizado profissional parece ser negligenciada. & Nbsp;Nosso estudo visa explorar os discursos dos professores na tentativa de mapear as práticas profissionais e identificar as necessidades de aprendizado; portanto, foi usada a metáfora de "Mind the Gap".Adotamos uma consultoria construcionista de métodos mistos ao longo de três fases (106, 39 e 49 participantes, respectivamente) incorporadas a um projeto transnacional em literacias digitais críticas (CDL) envolvendo a Finlândia, Itália, Espanha e Reino Unido.O foco foi colocado em redefinir componentes e dimensões críticas de alfabetização de dados e identificar lacunas em relação às necessidades de aprendizado profissional dos professores. & Nbsp;Os resultados indicam que a alfabetização de dados não estava tão presente quanto outras dimensões nas contas dos professores sobre os problemas de "dados" mais imediatos e relevantes.Isso tem implicações claras em relação à necessidade de enfrentar o desenvolvimento profissional dos professores para adotar práticas críticas de dados em um contexto digital que evolui. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Pesquisa construcionista;Alfabetização crítica de dados;Alfabetização digital crítica;Conhecimento profissional dos professores
Arthur, J., Waring, M., Coe, R., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.) (2012). Research Methods and Methodologies in Education. SAGE.
Barghava, R., Deahl, E., Letouzé, E., Noonan, A., Sangokoya, D., & Shoup, N. (2015). Beyond Data Literacy: Reinventing Community Engagement and Empowerment in the Age of Data. Data-Pop alliance white paper series. Retrieved August 29, 2022, from https://datapopalliance.org/publications/beyond-data-literacy-reinventing-community-engagement-and-empowerment-in-the-age-of-data/
Biesta, G. (2007). Why 'what works' won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
Buckingham, D. (2018). Taking charge: Media regulation, digital democracy and education. David Buckingham Blog. Retrieved August 29, 2022, from https://davidbuckingham.net/2018/10/03/taking-charge-media-regulation-digital-democracy-and-education/
Carretero Gomez, S., Vuorikari, R. and Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. EUR 28558 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/38842
Catlin-Groves, C. L. (2012). The citizen science landscape: From volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology, 2012(349630), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/349630
Chi, Y., Jeng, W., Acker, A., Bowler, L. (2018). Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Aspects of Teen Perspectives on Personal Data in Social Media: A Model of Youth Data Literacy. In G. Chowdhury, J. McLeod, V. Gillet, P. Willett (Eds) Transforming Digital Worlds: iConference 2018: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10766). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_49
Coughlan, T. (2020). The use of open data as a material for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09706-y
Coulter, I., Elfenbaum, P., Jain, S., & Jonas, W. (2016). SEaRCHTM expert panel process: Streamlining the link between evidence and practice. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1802-8
Daniel, B. K. (2015). Big Data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 904–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12230
Del Pozo, C. M., Martín del Campo Alcocer, A. V., & Róo Rubí, M. (2021). Aprendizaje en línea seguro: Políticas y gobernanza para la protección de datos de los estudiantes en América Latina. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.18235/0003675
Department of Education of UK. (2018). Data protection: A toolkit for schools Open Beta: Version 1.0. Department of Education, UK. Retrieved August 29, 2022, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-protection-toolkit-for-schools
D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001
European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). Education and Training. https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_en
Gleason, B., & Heath, M. K. (2021). Injustice embedded in Google Classroom and Google Meet: A techno-ethical audit of remote educational technologies. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1209
Gouseti, A., Bruni, I., Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Mundy, D., Raffaghelli, J. E., Ranieri, M., Roffi, A., Romero, M., & Romeu, T. (2021a). DETECT - DEveloping TEachers' Critical digital liTeracies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5070329
Gouseti, A., Bruni, I., Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Mundy, D., Raffaghelli, J. E., Ranieri, M., Roffi, A., Romero, M., & Romeu, T. (2021b). Schools' perceptions and experiences of critical digital literacies across four European countries. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5070394
Hartong, S., & Förschler, A. (2019). Opening the black box of data-based school monitoring: Data infrastructures, flows and practices in state education agencies. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719853311
Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 205395172098201. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012
JISC Programme. (2015). Developing students' digital literacy. Retrieved September 30, 2022, from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/developing-digital-literacies
Kerr, A., Barry, M., & Kelleher, J. D. (2020). Expectations of artificial intelligence and the performativity of ethics: Implications for communication governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720915939
Knaus, T. (2020). Technology criticism and data literacy: The case for an augmented understanding of media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(3), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-2020-12-3-2
Lincoln, Y., Lynham, S., & Guba, N. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th edition) (pp. 97–128). SAGE Publications.
Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686328
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12007
Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A Perfect Time for Data Use: Using Data-Driven Decision Making to Inform Practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011
Markham, A. N. (2018). Critical Pedagogy as a Response to Datafication. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809470
Marín, V. I., Carpenter, J. P., & Tur, G. (2021). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of social media data privacy policies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13035
Maybee, C., & Zilinski, L. (2015). Data informed learning: A next phase data literacy framework for higher education. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.1450520100108
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). 'Personal data literacies': A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media and Society, 21(2), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2020). Towards a school-based 'critical data education'. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 29(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1747527
Perrotta, C., Gulson, K. N., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2020). Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1855597
Prinsloo, P. (2020). Data frontiers and frontiers of power in (higher) education: A view of/from the Global South. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1723537
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2019). Developing a framework for educators' data literacy in the European context: Proposal, Implications and debate. International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies EDULEARN, 10520–10530. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2655
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2020). Is Data Literacy a Catalyst of Social Justice? A Response from Nine Data Literacy Initiatives in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090233
Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in 'educators' data literacy' to support future practices in faculty development: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
Risdale, C., Rothwell, J., Ali-Hassan, H., Bliemel, M., Irvine, D., Kelley, D., Matwin, S., & Wuetherick, B. (2015). Strategies and Best Practices for Data Literacy Education: Knowledge Synthesis Report. Dalhouse University Institutional Repository. Retrieved September 30, 2022, from http://hdl.handle.net/10222/64578
Sancho-Gil, J. M., Rivera-Vargas, P., & Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2020). Moving beyond the predictable failure of Ed-Tech initiatives. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1666873
Selwyn, N. (2020). 'Just playing around with Excel and pivot tables'—The realities of data-driven schooling. Research Papers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1812107
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015
Tygel, A. F., & Kirsch, R. (2016). Contributions of Paulo Freire for a Critical Data Literacy: A Popular Education Approach. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3279
US department of Education. (2020). Data Strategy. Reterieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/cdo/ed-data-strategy.pdf
Vanhoof, J., & Schildkamp, K. (2014). From 'professional development for data use' to 'data use for professional development'. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2014.05.001
Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
van der Zee, T., & Reich, J. (2018). Open Education Science. AERA Open, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418787466