Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2023-08-31
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/6360
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/6360/5636
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/6360/5636
Full Text XML: missing data
Alternate URL: https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2023-21/2/6360-what-works-to-enhance-lexical-skills-an-umbrella-review.html
Title: What Works to Enhance Lexical Skills: An Umbrella Review
Abstract: Lexical competence is the ability to understand and use words and expressions in a language appropriately. This competence is crucial for text comprehension and the development of reading skills. We conducted an umbrella review with two objectives: to identify effective strategies for enhancing lexical and reading competences, and to assess the methodological, instructional, and contextual factors that contribute to the effectiveness of interventions. Our review includes meta-analyses of experimental studies on the impact of lexical programs and provides insights into the process of searching, selecting, and analyzing these studies. The results of the review demonstrate that lexical interventions have a moderate effect on enhancing lexical and reading abilities, both in the native language and in second language contexts, with variations based on age and program type.
Keywords: Contextual factors; Effective strategies; Instructional factors; Lexical competence; Lexical interventions; Methodological factors; Reading skills development; Umbrella review; Vocabulary
Title: Cosa sappiamo sull'efficacia dei programmi di potenziamento lessicale: Una sintesi delle evidenze
Abstract: Il potenziamento del lessico è definito come lo sviluppo della competenza lessicale, intesa come la capacità di comprendere e utilizzare parole ed espressioni di una lingua in modo appropriato. Questa competenza è indispensabile per la comprensione del testo e per lo sviluppo delle abilità di lettura. Lo studio presenta una sintesi delle evidenze [umbrella review] con un duplice obiettivo: conoscere l'efficacia di interventi sulla competenza lessicale e, più in generale, sulla competenza di lettura; valutare quali fattori metodologici, didattici e contestuali contribuiscono alla qualità e all'efficacia degli interventi. La sintesi include meta-analisi di studi sperimentali sull'effetto di interventi lessicali ed esplicita il processo di ricerca, selezione e analisi degli studi. Dalle evidenze sintetizzate, emerge che tali interventi abbiamo un'efficacia moderata sullo sviluppo della competenza lessicale e di quella di lettura, sia nella lingua madre sia nella lingua seconda, con differenze sulla base dell'età dei soggetti e della tipologia di programma.
Keywords: Competenza lessicale; Fattori contestuali; Fattori didattici; Fattori metodologici; Interventi lessicali; Sintesi della ricerca; Strategie efficaci; Sviluppo delle competenze di lettura
Title: Ce que nous savons de l'efficacité des programmes de renforcement lexical: une synthèse des preuves
Abstract: Le renforcement du lexique est défini comme le développement de la compétence lexicale, compris comme la capacité de comprendre et d'utiliser les mots et les expressions d'une langue de manière appropriée.Cette compétence est essentielle pour la compréhension du texte et pour le développement des compétences en lecture.L'étude présente un résumé des preuves [revue parapluie] avec un double objectif: connaître l'efficacité des interventions sur la compétence lexicale et, plus généralement, sur la compétence en lecture;Évaluez les facteurs méthodologiques, éducatifs et contextuels contribuent à la qualité et à l'efficacité des interventions.La synthèse comprend la méta-analyse des études expérimentales sur l'effet des interventions lexicales et explicite le processus de recherche, de sélection et d'analyse des études.D'après les preuves sommaires, il émerge que ces interventions ont une efficacité modérée sur le développement de la compétence lexicale et celle de la lecture, à la fois dans la langue maternelle et dans la deuxième langue, avec des différences sur la base de l'âge des sujets et du type de programme. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Compétence lexicale;Facteurs contextuels;Facteurs éducatifs;Facteurs méthodologiques;Interventions lexicales;Synthèse de recherche;Stratégies efficaces;Développement de compétences en lecture
Title: ¿Qué sabemos sobre la eficacia de los programas de potenciación léxica? Una síntesis de las evidencias
Abstract: El fortalecimiento léxico se define como el desarrollo de la competencia léxica, entendida como la capacidad de comprender y utilizar palabras y expresiones de un idioma de manera adecuada. Esta competencia es esencial para la comprensión del texto y para el desarrollo de habilidades de lectura. El estudio presenta una síntesis de las evidencias [revisión umbrella] con un doble objetivo: conocer la eficacia de las intervenciones en la competencia léxica y, en general, en la competencia de lectura; evaluar qué factores metodológicos, didácticos y contextuales contribuyen a la calidad y eficacia de las intervenciones. La síntesis incluye metaanálisis de estudios experimentales sobre el efecto de intervenciones léxicas y explica el proceso de búsqueda, selección y análisis de los estudios. De las evidencias sintetizadas, se desprende que tales intervenciones tienen una eficacia moderada en el desarrollo de la competencia léxica y de lectura, tanto en la lengua materna como en la segunda lengua, con diferencias según la edad de los sujetos y el tipo de programa.
Keywords: Competencia léxica; Desarrollo de habilidades de lectura; Estrategias efectivas; Factores contextuales; Factores didácticos; Factores metodológicos; Intervenciones léxicas; Síntesis de la investigación
Title: O que sabemos sobre a eficácia dos programas de fortalecimento lexical: uma síntese de evidência
Abstract: O fortalecimento do léxico é definido como o desenvolvimento da competência lexical, entendida como a capacidade de entender e usar palavras e expressões de um idioma adequadamente.Essa competência é essencial para a compreensão do texto e para o desenvolvimento de habilidades de leitura.O estudo apresenta um resumo das evidências [revisão do guarda -chuva] com um objetivo duplo: conhecer a eficácia das intervenções na competência lexical e, mais geralmente, na competência de leitura;Avalie quais fatores metodológicos, educacionais e contextuais contribuem para a qualidade e a eficácia das intervenções.A síntese inclui metanálise de estudos experimentais sobre o efeito de intervenções lexicais e explícito o processo de pesquisa, seleção e análise de estudos.A partir da evidência sumária, surge que essas intervenções têm uma eficácia moderada no desenvolvimento da competência lexical e na leitura, tanto na língua materna quanto no segundo idioma, com diferenças com base na idade dos sujeitos e no tipo de programa. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Competência lexical;Fatores contextuais;Fatores educacionais;Fatores metodológicos;Intervenções lexicais;Síntese de pesquisa;Estratégias eficazes;Desenvolvimento de habilidades de leitura
Abrami, P. C., Lysenko, L., & Borokhovski, E. (2020). The effects of ABRACADABRA on reading outcomes: An updated meta‐analysis and landscape review of applied field research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12417
Anderson, R., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Ardasheva, Y., Hao, T., & Zhang, X. (2019). Pedagogical implications of current SLA research for vocabulary skills. In N. Polat, P. MacIntyre, & T. Gregersen (Eds.), Research-driven pedagogy: Implications of L2A theory and research for the teaching of language skills (pp. 125–144). Routledge.
Balboni, P. E. (2014). Didattica dell'italiano come lingua seconda e straniera. Torino: Loescher.
Becker, B. J., & Aloe, A. M. (2019). Model-based meta-analysis and related approaches. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 339–363). Russell Sage Foundation.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control (Vol. 1). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Calvani, A., & Chiappetta Cajola, L. (Eds.). (2019). Strategie efficaci per la comprensione del testo: Il Reciprocal teaching. Firenze: SApIE Scientifica.
Chall, J. (1987). Two Vocabularies for Reading: Recognition and Meaning. McKeown and Curtis.
Chen, M. H., Tseng, W. T., & Hsiao, T. Y. (2018). The effectiveness of digital game-based vocabulary learning: A framework-based view of meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12526
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292.
Cossu, G. (2013). TNL–Test Neuropsicologico lessicale per l'età evolutiva. Firenze: Hogrefe.
De Mauro, T. (1963). Storia linguistica dell'Italia unita. Bari: Laterza.
De Mauro, T. (2014). Storia linguistica dell'Italia repubblicana. Dal 1946 ai nostri giorni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). P.P.V.T. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MI: American Guidance Service.
Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Passage-Level Comprehension of School-Age Children: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1-44. 10.1080/19345740802539200
Ferreri, S. (2005). L'alfabetizzazione lessicale: studi di linguistica educativa. Roma: Aracne.
Gorjian, B., Moosavinia, S. R., Kavari, K. E., Asgari, P., & Hydarei, A. (2011). The impact of asynchronous computer-assisted language learning approaches on English as a foreign language high and low achievers' vocabulary retention and recall. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.552186
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hall, C., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., McCulley, L. V., Carroll, M., & Vaughn, S. (2017). Reading instruction for English learners in the middle grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 763–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9372-4
INVALSI. (2022). Rapporto INVALSI 2022. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/2022/Rilevazioni_Nazionali/Rapporto/Rapporto_Prove_INVALSI_2022.pdf
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Kieffer, M. J., Petscher, Y., Proctor, C. P., & Silverman, R. D. (2016). Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Modeling the contributions of language comprehension skills to reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(6), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1214591
Laufer, B. (2013). Lexical Thresholds for Reading Comprehension: What They Are and How They Can Be Used for Teaching Purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 867–872. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43267941
Mezynski, K. (1983). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge: Effects of vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 53, 253–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170386
Milani, L. (1958). Esperienze pastorali. Firenze: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina.
Montesano, L. (2020). Vocabolario e Comprensione del testo. Uno strumento per la valutazione del lessico nella scuola Primaria. SApIE Scientifica, Firenze.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel--Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Riccardi Ripamonti, I., Cividati, B., Russo, V., Zerbini, A. & Rossoni, I. (2014). Test VCLA-PAROLE. Valutazione delle Competenze Linguistiche Alte. Prove per l'individuazione delle abilità logico-verbali, espressive e morfologiche. Trento: Erickson.
Rodari, G. (1973). Grammatica della Fantasia. Introduzione all'arte di inventare storie. Torino: Einaudi.
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman, & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford.
Silverman, R., Johnson, E., Keane, K., & Khanna, S. (2020). Beyond Decoding: A Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Language Comprehension Interventions on K–5 Students' Language and Literacy Outcomes. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S207–S233. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.346
Stahl S. & Nagy W. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170287
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences for the individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. Retrieved May 15, 2023, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/747612
Thurstone, T. G., & Thurstone, L. L. (1962). P.M.A. Primary Mental Abilities. Science Research Associates.
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—WISC-IV. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Wolf, B., & Harbatkin, E. (2023). Making sense of effect sizes: Systematic differences in intervention effect sizes by outcome measure type. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 16(1), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2071364
Yu, A., & Trainin, G. (2022). A meta-analysis examining technology-assisted L2 vocabulary learning. ReCALL 34(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000239