Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2023-12-29
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/6658
Full Text HTML (viewer): missing data
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/6658/6004
Full Text HTML (file): missing data
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/6658/6004
Full Text XML: missing data
Alternate URL: https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2023-21/3/6658-the-assessment-of-students-entrepreneurship-competence-.html
Title: The assessment of students' entrepreneurship competence: Results from an interfaculty event based on Google Design Sprint
Abstract: This contribution assesses the entrepreneurship competence that students cultivated during an interfaculty and innovative initiative grounded on Google Design Sprint methodology. It adopts a combined set of tools to gather data, including an online questionnaire leaning on the EntreComp framework, with both Likert scales and open-ended questions, as well as focus groups asking the participants what they learnt during the initiative. The analyses triangulate both descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results contend that the most important competence cultivated is groupwork in heterogenous groups, while a notable offshoot is the nurturing of diverse EntreComp related competences. The conclusion argue that EntreComp is suitable to assess competences from a prescriptive approach, i.e., as standard, especially when it is combined with a contextual approach such as the theory of constructive alignment, focusing on performance and on the learning outcomes students achieved.
Keywords: EntreComp framework; Entrepreneurship education; Google Design Sprint; Problem based learning; Program evaluation
Title: La valutazione della competenza imprenditoriale degli studenti: Risultati da un'iniziativa interfacoltà basata su Google Design Sprint
Abstract: Questo contributo valuta la competenza imprenditoriale sviluppata dagli studenti durante un programma innovativo e interfacoltà basato sulla metodologia Google Design Sprint. Adotta un set combinato di strumenti per raccogliere dati, incluso un questionario online basato sul framework Entrecomp, e dotato sia di scale Likert che di domande aperte, come pure focus group su quello che i partecipanti hanno appreso durante l'iniziativa. Le analisi triangolano sia le statistiche descrittive che le analisi tematiche. I risultati suggeriscono che la competenza più importante sviluppata durante questa esperienza è il lavoro di gruppo in team eterogenei, anche se i partecipanti hanno sviluppato diverse altre competenze connesse a EntreComp. Nelle conclusioni si argomenta come questo framework sia indicato per valutare le competenze da un punto di vista prescrittivo, cioè come standard, specialmente quando combinato a un approccio più contestuale come la teoria dell'apprendimento costruttivo, che si focalizza sulla performance e sui risultati di apprendimento acquisiti dagli studenti.
Keywords: Educazione all'imprenditorialità; Framework EntreComp; Google Design Sprint; Problem based leanring; Valutazione di programmi
Title: L'évaluation de la compétence en entrepreneuriat des étudiants: résultats d'un événement interfaculté basé sur Google Design Sprint
Abstract: Cette contribution évalue la compétence en entrepreneuriat que les étudiants ont cultivé lors d'une initiative interfaculté et innovante fondée sur la méthodologie de Google Design Sprint.Il adopte un ensemble combiné d'outils pour recueillir des données, y compris un questionnaire en ligne s'appuyant sur le cadre Entrecomp, avec des échelles de Likert et des questions ouvertes, ainsi que des groupes de discussion demandant aux participants ce qu'ils ont appris au cours de l'initiative.Les analyses triangulées à la fois des statistiques descriptives et une analyse thématique.Les résultats soutiennent que la compétence la plus importante cultivée est le travail de groupe dans les groupes hétérogènes, tandis qu'une ramification notable est l'éducation de diverses compétences liées à l'entrée.La conclusion soutient qu'Entrecomp est adapté pour évaluer les compétences d'une approche normative, c'est-à-dire en standard, en particulier lorsqu'elle est combinée avec une approche contextuelle telle que la théorie de l'alignement constructif, en se concentrant sur la performance et sur les résultats d'apprentissage que les élèves ont atteint. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Framework entrecomp;Éducation à l'entrepreneuriat;Google Design Sprint;Apprentissage basé sur des problèmes;Évaluation du programme
Title: Evaluación de la competencia emprendedora de los estudiantes: Resultados de un evento interfacultativo basado en Google Design Sprint
Abstract: Esta contribución evalúa la competencia emprendedora que los estudiantes cultivaron durante una iniciativa interfacultativa e innovadora basada en la metodología de Google Design Sprint. Adopta un conjunto combinado de herramientas para recopilar datos, incluyendo un cuestionario en línea basado en el marco de EntreComp, con escalas Likert y preguntas abiertas, así como grupos focales que preguntan a los participantes qué aprendieron durante la iniciativa. Los análisis triangulan tanto estadísticas descriptivas como análisis temático. Los resultados sostienen que la competencia más importante cultivada es el trabajo en grupo en grupos heterogéneos, mientras que un subproducto notable es el fomento de diversas competencias relacionadas con EntreComp. La conclusión argumenta que EntreComp es adecuado para evaluar competencias desde un enfoque prescriptivo, es decir, como estándar, especialmente cuando se combina con un enfoque contextual como la teoría del alineamiento constructivo, enfocándose en el rendimiento y en los resultados de aprendizaje alcanzados por los estudiantes.
Keywords: Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas; Educación Emprendedora; EntreComp framework; Evaluación de Programas; Google Design Sprint
Title: A avaliação da competência do empreendedorismo dos alunos: resultados de um evento interfaculty baseado no Google Design Sprint
Abstract: Essa contribuição avalia a competência de empreendedorismo que os alunos cultivaram durante uma iniciativa interfacultidade e inovadora fundamentada na metodologia do Google Design Sprint.Ele adota um conjunto combinado de ferramentas para coletar dados, incluindo um questionário on-line, apoiado na estrutura da Entrecomp, com escalas Likert e perguntas abertas, além de grupos focais perguntando aos participantes o que aprenderam durante a iniciativa.As análises trianguulam estatísticas descritivas e a análise temática.Os resultados afirmam que a competência mais importante cultivada é o trabalho em grupo em grupos heterogêneos, enquanto uma ramificação notável é a nutrição de diversas competências relacionadas à Entrecomp.A conclusão argumenta que a Entrecomp é adequada para avaliar as competências de uma abordagem prescritiva, ou seja, como padrão, especialmente quando é combinada com uma abordagem contextual, como a teoria do alinhamento construtivo, focando no desempenho e nos resultados dos resultados da aprendizagem alcançados. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Framework de Entrecomp;Educação de Empreendedorismo;Google Design Sprint;Aprendizado baseado em problemas;Avaliação do programa
Bacigalupo, M. (2022). The European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework (EntreComp). A Conceptual Model Built and Tested by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. Journal of Creative Industries and Cultural Studies, (4), 38–53. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/43287
Bacigalupo, M., Lilian, W. G., Yashar, M., & O'Keeffe, W. (2020). EntreComp Playbook: Entrepreneurial Learning Beyond the Classroom. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/77835
Baena-Luna, P., García-Río, E., & Monge-Agüero, M. (2020). Entrecomp: marco competencial para el emprendimiento. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre su uso y aplicación. Información Tecnológica, 31(2), 163–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000200163
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486.
Bassett, J., Cleveland, A., Acorn, D., Nix, M., & Snyder, T. (2017). Are they paying attention? Students' lack of motivation and attention potentially threaten the utility of course evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1119801
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5–22. Retrieved July 15, 2023, from https://www.tru.ca/__shared/assets/Constructive_Alignment36087.pdf
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1989). Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment using the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/168781408903300205
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. New York: McGraw-hill.
Blenker, P., Trolle Elmholdt, S., Hedeboe Frederiksen, S., Korsgaard, S., & Wagner, K. (2014). Methods in entrepreneurship education research: A review and integrative framework. Education + Training, 56(8/9), 697–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2014-0066
Boyas, E., Bryan, L. D., & Lee, T. (2012). Conditions affecting the usefulness of pre- and post-tests for assessment purposes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.538665
Castoldi, M. (2012). Valutare a scuola. Dagli apprendimenti alla valutazione di Sistema. Roma: Carocci.
Dahler-Larsen, P. (2018) Qualitative Evaluation: Methods, ethics and politics with stakeholders. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of Qualitative Research, Vol. 5 (pp. 867–886). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
European Commission, D.-G. for E., Youth, Sport and Culture. (2019). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (European Commission), Bacigalupo, M., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/593884
Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Vol. 5 (pp. 444–461). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070
Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027
Golding C., & Adam, L. (2016) Evaluate to improve: useful approaches to student evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.976810
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hung, W. (2009). The 9-step problem design process for problem-based learning: Application of the 3C3R model. Educational Research Review, 4(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.12.001
Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., & Kowitz, B. (2016). Sprint: How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days (First Simon&Schuster hardcover edition). Simon & Schuster.
Koenen, A. K., Dochy, F., & Berghmans, I. (2015). A phenomenographic analysis of the implementation of competence-based education in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.04.001
López-Núñez, M. I., Rubio-Valdehita, S., Armuña, C., & Pérez-Urria, E. (2022). EntreComp Questionnaire: A Self-Assessment Tool for Entrepreneurship Competencies. Sustainability, 14(5), 2983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052983
Morselli, D. (2018). Teaching a sense of initiative and entrepreneurship with constructive alignment in tertiary non-business contexts. Education + Training, 60(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2017-0093
Morselli, D., & Gorenc, J. (2022). Using the EntreComp framework to evaluate two entrepreneurship education courses based on the Korda Method. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(1), 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100591
Mortari, L., & Silva, R. (2020). Valutare un Teaching Program attraverso l'esperienza degli alumni: Una ricerca empirica che offre stimoli alla riprogettazione didattica. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 25, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.7346/SIRD-022020-P137
Mulder, M., & Winterton, J. (2017). Introduction. In M. Mulder (Ed.), Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education (Vol. 23, pp. 1–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_1
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030: The future we want. OECD Publishing. Retrieved December 10, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., Smith, A., & Papadakos, P. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want. Get started with. Wiley.
Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological (Second edition). Sage.
Richter, N., Schildhauer, T., & Jackson, P. (2018). Meeting the innovation challenge: Agile processes for established organisations. In N. Richter, P. Jackson, & T. Schildhauer (Eds.), Entrepreneurial innovation and leadership (pp. 109–121). Cham: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71737-1
Savery, J R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Sprintlab. (2021). Javelin Board: Cos'è, A Cosa Serve, Come Compilarla. Blog.Sprintlab.It. https://web.archive.org/web/20230923204251/https://blog.sprintlab.it/javelin-board/
Viganò, R. (2020). Valutare l'insegnamento nell'istruzione superiore. A cosa serve veramente? Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, 13(24), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.7346/SIRD-012020-P120
Wangsa, K., Chugh, R., Karim, S., & Sandu, R. (2022). A comparative study between design thinking, agile, and design sprint methodologies. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 15(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2022.124916
Yanchar, S. C. (2011), Using numerical data in explicitly interpretive, contextual inquiry: a 'practical discourse' framework and examples from Engeström's research on activity systems, Theory & Psychology, 21(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310393777
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (Fifth edition). Sage.