Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2024-05-15
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/7099
Full Text HTML (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/7099/6300
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/7099/6299
Full Text HTML (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/7099/6300
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/7099/6299
Alternate URL (this mirror): https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2024-22/1/7099-beyond-formative-assessment-construction-and-validation
Title: Beyond formative assessment: Construction and validation of the Teachers' Assessment Strategies Scale (StraVI)
Abstract: The study presents the process of construction and validation of the Teachers' Assessment Strategies Scale (StraVI), designed to identify the formative assessment strategies employed by primary and secondary school teachers for in-class assessment. The validation sample consists of 1,545 serving teachers, distributed nationwide. The StraVI scale, subjected to both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, demonstrates robust psychometric properties and is delineated into the following dimensions: Assessment strategies oriented towards improving learning (S-AfL) and Assessment strategies oriented towards self-regulation and sustainability of learning (S-AaL). This instrument addresses a gap in the existing toolkit within the field, by honing in on the specifics of various formative assessment strategies, distinguishing between strategies associated with the assessment for learning approach and those linked to the assessment as learning approach, while also paying particular attention to sustainable assessment.
Keywords: assessment as learning; assessment for learning; assessment strategies; sustainable assessment; validation
Title: Oltre la valutazione formativa: Costruzione e validazione della scala delle Strategie Valutative degli Insegnanti (StraVI)
Abstract: Lo studio presenta il processo di costruzione e validazione della scala delle Strategie Valutative degli Insegnanti (StraVI), progettata per rilevare le strategie di valutazione di tipo formativo utilizzate dagli insegnanti di scuola primaria e secondaria per la valutazione in classe. Il campione di validazione è costituito da 1.545 docenti in servizio, distribuiti su tutto il territorio nazionale. La scala StraVI, sottoposta ad analisi fattoriale esplorativa e confermativa, mostra buone proprietà psicometriche e si articola nelle seguenti dimensioni: Strategie valutative orientate al miglioramento degli apprendimenti (S-AfL) e Strategie valutative orientate all'autoregolazione e alla sostenibilità dell'apprendimento (S-AaL). Questo strumento colma un vuoto nel panorama degli strumenti disponibili nel settore, poiché mette a fuoco le specificità delle diverse strategie di valutazione formativa, distinguendo tra strategie legate all'approccio di assessment for learning e strategie correlate all'approccio di assessment as learning, con una particolare attenzione anche al sustainable assessment.
Keywords: strategie valutative; validazione; valutazione come apprendimento; valutazione per l'apprendimento; valutazione sostenibile
Title: En plus de l'évaluation de la formation: construction et validation de l'ampleur des stratégies d'évaluation des enseignants (Stravi)
Abstract: L'étude présente le processus de construction et de validation de l'ampleur des stratégies d'évaluation des enseignants (Stravi), conçues pour détecter les stratégies de formation utilisées par les enseignants primaires et secondaires pour l'évaluation des classes.L'échantillon de validation se compose de 1 545 enseignants en service, distribués sur tout le territoire national.L'échelle de Stravi, soumise à une analyse factorielle exploratoire et de confirmation, montre de bonnes propriétés psychométriques et est divisée en dimensions suivantes: stratégies d'évaluation orientées vers l'amélioration de l'apprentissage (S-AFL) et des stratégies d'évaluation orientées vers l'autorégulation et la durabilité de l'apprentissage (S-AL).Cet outil comble un vide dans le panorama des outils disponibles dans le secteur, car il se concentre sur les spécificités des différentes stratégies d'évaluation de la formation, distinguant les stratégies liées à l'évaluation de l'approche d'apprentissage et des stratégies liées à l'évaluation en tant qu'approche d'apprentissage, avec une attention particulière également à l'évaluation durable. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: stratégies d'évaluation;validation;Évaluation comme apprentissage;évaluation de l'apprentissage;évaluation durable
Title: Más allá de la evaluación formativa: Construcción y validación de la escala de Estrategias Evaluativas de los Profesores (StraVI)
Abstract: El estudio presenta el proceso de construcción y validación de la escala de Estrategias Evaluativas de los Profesores (StraVI), diseñada para detectar las estrategias de evaluación formativa utilizadas por los profesores de educación primaria y secundaria en la evaluación en el aula. La muestra de validación está compuesta por 1.545 docentes en activo, distribuidos por todo el territorio nacional. La escala StraVI, sometida a análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio, muestra buenas propiedades psicométricas y se articula en las siguientes dimensiones: Estrategias evaluativas orientadas a la mejora del aprendizaje (S-AfL) y Estrategias evaluativas orientadas a la autorregulación y sostenibilidad del aprendizaje (S-AaL). Esta herramienta llena un vacío en el panorama de los instrumentos disponibles en el sector, ya que enfoca las especificidades de las diferentes estrategias de evaluación formativa, distinguiendo entre estrategias relacionadas con el enfoque de assessment for learning y estrategias relacionadas con el enfoque de assessment as learning, con una atención particular también al sustainable assessment.
Keywords: Estrategias evaluativas; Evaluación como aprendizaje; Evaluación para el aprendizaje; Evaluación sostenible; Validación
Title: Além da avaliação formativa: Construção e validação da escala de Estratégias Avaliativas dos Professores (StraVI)
Abstract: O estudo apresenta o processo de construção e validação da escala de Estratégias Avaliativas dos Professores (StraVI), projetada para detectar as estratégias de avaliação formativa utilizadas por professores do ensino fundamental e médio para avaliação em sala de aula. A amostra de validação é composta por 1.545 professores em atividade, distribuídos por todo o território nacional. A escala StraVI, submetida a análise fatorial exploratória e confirmatória, mostra boas propriedades psicométricas e se articula nas seguintes dimensões: Estratégias avaliativas voltadas para a melhoria da aprendizagem (S-AfL) e Estratégias avaliativas voltadas para a autorregulação e sustentabilidade da aprendizagem (S-AaL). Esta ferramenta preenche uma lacuna no panorama dos instrumentos disponíveis no setor, focando nas especificidades das diferentes estratégias de avaliação formativa, distinguindo entre estratégias relacionadas à abordagem de assessment for learning e estratégias relacionadas à abordagem de assessment as learning, com uma atenção especial também ao sustainable assessment.
Keywords: Avaliação como aprendizagem; Avaliação para a aprendizagem; Avaliação sustentável; Estratégias avaliativas; Validação
Assessment Reform Group (ARG) (2002). Assessment is for learning: 10 principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. https://assessmentreformgroup.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/10principles_english.pdf
Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 296–298.
Batini, F., & Guerra, M. (2020). Gli effetti della valutazione formativa sull'apprendimento nella scuola primaria. Una revisione sistematica. Pedagogia più Didattica, 6(2), 78–93.
Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2021). Sustainable learning in education. Sustainability, 13(8), Article 4250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084250
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
Boud, D. (2022). Assessment-as-learning for the development of students' evaluative judge- ment. In Z. Yan, & L. Yang (Eds.), Assessment as learning: Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement (pp. 25–37). Routledge. [Versione Kindle MAC].
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
Cheung, G. W., & Resnvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
Corsini, C. (2023). La valutazione che educa. Liberare insegnamento e apprendimento dalla tirannia del voto. FrancoAngeli.
Crooks, T. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: New Zealand. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.002
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as Learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). Corwin.
Fleiss, J. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18(1), 39–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312
Galliani, L. (2009). Web ontology della valutazione educativa. Pensa MultiMedia.
Graham, L., Berman, J., & Bellert, A. (2015). Sustainable learning. Cambridge University Press.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Person Education Limited.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses on achievement. Routledge.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark 4. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Lam, R. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: Surveying knowledge, conceptions and practices of classroom-based writing assessment in Hong Kong. System, 81, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.006
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334770
Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
Meusen-Beekman, K., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, E. (2016b). De retentie van zelfregulatie, motivatie en self-efficacy in het voortgezet onderwijs na formatieve assessments in het basisonderwijs. Pedagogische Studiën, 93(3), 136–153.
Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
Pavlov, G., Shi, D., & Maydeu-Olivares, a. (2020) Chi-square Difference Tests for Comparing Nested Models: An Evaluation with Non-normal Data, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(6), 908–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1717957
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, Article 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23–74.
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Scierri, I. D. M. (2021). Strategie e strumenti di valutazione formativa per promuovere l'apprendimento autoregolato: una rassegna ragionata delle ricerche empiriche. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 24, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2021-024-scie
Scierri, I. D. M. (2022). Finalità e modi della valutazione: primi risultati di un'indagine su concezioni e strategie valutative dei docenti delle scuole italiane. In V. Boffo, & F. Togni (Eds.), Esercizi di ricerca. Dottorato e politiche della formazione (pp. 197–206). Firenze University Press.
Scierri, I. D. M. (2023). Per una valutazione centrata sull'allievo: framework teorico e primi risultati di un'indagine su concezioni e strategie valutative degli insegnanti. Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 19(42), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.19241/lll.v19i42.754
Scierri, I. D. M., Viola, M., & Capperucci, D. (2023). Gli effetti di una valutazione come apprendimento sullo sviluppo del giudizio valutativo e sull'autoefficacia degli studenti: una esperienza nella scuola primaria. QTimes – webmagazine, XV, 4, 290–305.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City.
Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2007). Learning to love assessment. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 8–13.
Trinchero, R. (2017). Attivare cognitivamente con la valutazione formante. In A. M. Notti (Ed.), La funzione educativa della valutazione. Teorie e pratiche della valutazione educativa (pp. 73–90). Pensa MultiMedia.
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
Vertecchi, B. (2023, febbraio). Ipotesi per un esperimento. Tuttoscuola, XLVIII, 26–27.
Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
Wiliam, D., & Black, P. J. (1996). Meanings and consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22, 537–548.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Yan, Z., & Boud, D. (2022). Conceptualising assessment-as-learning. In Z. Yan, & L. Yang, (Eds.), Assessment as Learning. Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement (pp. 11–24). Routledge. [Versione Kindle MAC].