Formazione & insegnamento
ISSN: 2279-7505 | Published: 2024-05-15
This landing page is part of an alternate academic indexing and SEO initiative curated by Pensa MultiMedia and the Executive Editorial Office.
Main Article Landing Page: https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/7233
Full Text HTML (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/7233/6178
Full Text PDF (viewer): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/view/7233/6100
Full Text HTML (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/7233/6178
Full Text PDF (file): https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/siref/article/download/7233/6100
Full Text XML: missing data
Alternate URL: https://formazione-insegnamento.eu/2024-22/1/7233-the-contribution-of-generative-ai-ecosystems-in-micro-i.html
Title: The Contribution of Generative AI Ecosystems in Micro-Instructional Design: Opportunities and Limitations
Abstract: Pedagogical Planners (PP) are digital environments specifically developed with the aim of accompanying teachers in making visible and methodologically grounded, the process of designing and implementing teaching-learning experiences. In more recent times, the integration of generative AI algorithms within PP, such as AI Lesson Planners, opens new educational challenges and unprecedented perspectives for educational research and practice. The question that remains open is, what is the emerging School idea and what teacher idea is implicated in the development of these generative AI ecosystems?
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Design for learning; Pedagogical Planner; Teacher Professionalism
Title: Il contributo degli ecosistemi di AI generativa nella micro-progettazione didattica: opportunità e limiti
Abstract: I Pedagogical Planner (PP) sono ambienti digitali sviluppati ad hoc con l'obiettivo di accompagnare i docenti nel rendere visibile (e metodologicamente fondato), il processo di ideazione e implementazione di esperienze d'insegnamento-apprendimento. L'adozione di tali ambienti, nel contesto scolastico, è stata inizialmente limitata dalla mancanza di applicazioni specifiche, dalla bassa diffusione di questi sistemi nelle scuole e da alcuni limiti legati alla 'staticità' delle proposte didattiche generate da questi tools. Tuttavia, in tempi più recenti, l'integrazione di algoritmi di Intelligenza Artificiale generativa all'interno di PP, come gli AI Lesson Planner, apre a nuove sfide didattiche e a inedite prospettive di ricerca educativa. Così come a quesiti sul reale ruolo dell'insegnante al suo interno.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Pedagogical Planner; Professionalità docente; Progettazione didattica
Title: La contribution des écosystèmes génératifs de l'IA dans la micro-prowesse didactique: opportunités et limites
Abstract: Planificateur pédagogique (PP) sont des environnements numériques développés ad hoc dans le but d'accompagner les enseignants à rendre visibles (et fondé méthodologiquement), le processus de création et de mise en œuvre d'expériences d'enseignement d'apprentissage.L'adoption de ces environnements, dans le contexte scolaire, a été initialement limitée par le manque d'applications spécifiques, par la faible diffusion de ces systèmes dans les écoles et par certaines limites liées à la «nature statique» des propositions didactiques générées par ces outils.Cependant, plus récemment, l'intégration des algorithmes génératifs de l'intelligence artificielle au sein de PP, tels que le planificateur de leçon d'IA IA, s'ouvre aux nouveaux défis didactiques et aux perspectives non publiées de la recherche éducative.Ainsi que sur les questions sur le vrai rôle de l'enseignant à l'intérieur. (This version of record did not originally feature translated metadata in this target language; the translation is hereby provided by Google Translation)
Keywords: Intelligence artificielle;Planificateur pédagogique;Professionnalisme du professeur;Conception pédagogique
Title: El aporte de los ecosistemas de IA generativa en la micro-diseño instruccional: Oportunidades y limitaciones
Abstract: Los Planificadores Pedagógicos [Pedagogical Planners] (PP) son entornos digitales desarrollados ad hoc con el objetivo de asistir a los docentes en hacer visible (y metodológicamente fundamentado) el proceso de ideación e implementación de experiencias de enseñanza-aprendizaje. La adopción de tales entornos en el contexto educativo inicialmente fue limitada por la falta de aplicaciones específicas, la baja difusión de estos sistemas en las escuelas y algunas limitaciones relacionadas con la 'estaticidad' de las propuestas didácticas generadas por estas herramientas. Sin embargo, en tiempos más recientes, la integración de algoritmos de Inteligencia Artificial generativa dentro de los PP, como los Planificadores de Lecciones AI [AI Lesson Planner], abre nuevas desafíos educativos y perspectivas inéditas de investigación educativa. Esto también plantea interrogantes sobre el verdadero papel del docente dentro de ello.
Keywords: Diseño instruccional; Inteligencia Artificial; Planificador Pedagógico; Profesionalidad docente
Title: A Contribuição dos Ecossistemas de IA Generativa no Micro-Design Instrucional: Oportunidades e Limitações
Abstract: Os Planejadores Pedagógicos [Pedagogical Planners] (PP) são ambientes digitais desenvolvidos ad hoc com o objetivo de auxiliar professores a tornar visível (e metodologicamente fundamentado) o processo de ideação e implementação de experiências de ensino-aprendizagem. A adoção desses ambientes no contexto educacional foi inicialmente limitada pela falta de aplicações específicas, pela baixa disseminação desses sistemas nas escolas e por algumas limitações relacionadas à 'estaticidade' das propostas instrucionais geradas por essas ferramentas. No entanto, em tempos mais recentes, a integração de algoritmos de Inteligência Artificial generativa dentro dos PP, como os Planejadores de Aula IA [AI Lesson Planner], abre novos desafios educacionais e perspectivas inéditas de pesquisa educacional. Isso também levanta questões sobre o verdadeiro papel do professor dentro dele.
Keywords: Design Instrucional; Inteligência Artificial; Planejador Pedagógico; Profissionalismo docente
Antonenko, P., Abramowitz, B. (2023). In-service teachers' (mis)conceptions of artificial intelligence in K-12 science education, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, (55)1, 64-78, https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2119450
Baldacci, M. (2012). Trattato di pedagogia. Roma: Carocci.
Bertin, G. M. (1968). Educazione alla ragione. Roma: Armando Editore.
Bertolini, P. (1983). Pedagogia e scienze umane. Bologna: CLUEB.
Bottino M. R, Ott, M. Tavella M. (2011). Pedagogical planning and sustainability of learning actions: the Iamel system. Tecnologie Didattiche, 19(3), 147-154, https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/207
Cameron, L., & Campbell, C. (2010). Sharing learning designs that work. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Conole, G., & Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive. Media in Education, 8(1) https://doi.org/10.5334/2005-8
Costa, N. Pereira Junior, C., Araujo, R., Fernandes, M. (2019). Application of AI Planning in the Context of e-Learning, IEEE Computer Society, 57-59, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2019.00021
Dalziel J. (2003). Implementing learning design: the learning activity management system (LAMS). In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, J. Baron (eds.). Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasia Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (AS-CILITE). Interact, Integrate, Impact (Adelaide, Australia, 7-10 december 2003). ASCILITE, 593-596.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dong, Y. (2023). Revolutionizing Academic English Writing through AI-Powered Pedagogy: Practical Exploration of Teaching Process and Assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), pp.52-57. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1177
Fabbri, M. (2018). Oltre il disagio. Percorsi di crisi, orizzonti di civiltà. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Ferrari, L (2015). Costruire esperienze didattiche di online collaborative learning. Parma: Junior.
Kehoe, F. (2023). Leveraging Generative AI Tools for Enhanced Lesson Planning in Initial Teacher Education at Post Primary. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 172-182, https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.124
Laurillard, D. (2014), Insegnamento come progettazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Margiotta, U. (a cura di) (2018). Teacher Education Agenda. Linee guida per la formazione iniziale dei docenti della scuola secondaria. Trento: Erickson.
Masterman, E., Manton, M. (2011). Teachers' perspectives on digital tools for pedagogic planning and design. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.588414
Masterman, E., Walker, S., & Bower, M. (2013). Computational support for teachers' design thinking: Its feasibility and acceptability to practitioners and institutions. Educational Media International, 50, 12-23. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/132440/
Miller, A. L. (2023). AI Assisted Learning: A Tool or a Threat? Journal of e-learning Research, 2(2), 52-65, https://doi.org/10.33422/jelr.v2i2.510
Mor Y., Warburton S., Winters N., Mellar H. (eds.) (2014). Practical design patterns for teaching and learning with technology. Rotterdam: Sense.
Nerantzi, C., Abegglen, S., Karatsiori, M., Martinez-Arboleda, A. (2023). 101 Creative ideas to use AI in education. A collection curated by #creativeHE.
OECD (2010). Inspired by Technology, Driven by Pedagogy. A Systemic Approach To Technology-Based School Innovations. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Persico, D. & Pozzi, F. (2013). Sustaining Learning Design and Pedagogical Planning in CSCL. Research in Learning Technology, 21, https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17585
Pozzi, F., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Ceregini, A., Dagnino, F. M., Dimitriadis, Y., & Earp, J. (2020). Supporting and representing Learning Design with digital tools: in between guidance and flexibility. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 109-128, https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1714708
Rivoltella P. C. (2012). Neurodidattica. Insegnare al cervello che apprende. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
Rossi, P.G. (2014), Le tecnologie digitali per la progettazione didattica. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), [S.l.], 10, 113-133, https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2014-010-ross
Rossi, P.G. (2016). Progettazione didattica e professionalità docente. PROPIT: l'artefatto progettuale come mediatore didattico. In P.G. Rossi, C. Giaconi (a cura di). Micro-progettazione: pratiche didattiche a confronto PROPIT, EAS, Flipped Classroom. Milano: Franco Angeli.
San Diego, J. P., Laurillard, D., Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Ljubojevic, D., Neumann, T., Pearce, D. (2008). Towards a user-oriented analytical approach to learning design. ALT-J, 16(1), 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687760701850174
Winograd, T. (1996). Bringing design to software. New York, NY: ACM Press.
Yue, M., Jong, M.S., Dai, Y. (2022). Pedagogical Design of K-12 Artificial Intelligence Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 14, 15620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620